A clear ranking of projects nicely corresponding with observedinvestments.1. Nord Stream: the strategic value for the initiators of theconsortium, Germany (Center) and Russia, is large and clearlyexceeds the project's cost.2. South Stream: given its higher cost, the viability isquestionable, in particular if Nord Stream's capacity is accountedfor. Regulatory holidays for NW section critical.3. Nabucco: the gains for the EU are marginal and do not covercost. The eastern sections are protable for Turkey.
展开▼
机译：清晰的项目排名与观察结果非常吻合
投资。
1. Nord Stream：Native Stream发起者的战略价值
财团，德国（中部）和俄罗斯，规模庞大且明显
超出了项目的成本。
2. South Stream：鉴于其较高的成本，其可行性是
值得怀疑，特别是如果考虑了北溪的能力
为了。西北节的法定节假日很重要。
3.纳布科：欧盟的收益微不足道，无法涵盖
成本。东部地区很适合土耳其。
展开▼
