首页> 外文会议>Brazilian Symposium on Components, Architectures and Reuse Software >SyMPLES-CVL: A SysML and CVL Based Approach for Product-Line Development of Embedded Systems
【24h】

SyMPLES-CVL: A SysML and CVL Based Approach for Product-Line Development of Embedded Systems

机译:SyMPLES-CVL:基于SysML和CVL的嵌入式系统产品线开发方法

获取原文

摘要

Background: A Software Product Line (SPL) is a group of systems that share a common set of features satisfying the specific needs of a market segment. These systems are systematicaly developed from a common set of core assets. Objective: This paper proposes SyMPLES-CVL, an alternative approach to the management of variability based on SysML models to support the development of SPLs for embedded systems. In addition, we present a comparative study between our previous approach, SyMPLES-SMarty, and SyMPLES-CVL. Method: SyMPLES-CVL was specified based on SyMPLES-SMarty, then an experimental study was carry to compare the approaches. A total of 20 participants with Software Engineering background were divided into two groups, one for each approach. The data were collected with the support of questionnaires which was analysed based on test hypotheses using inferential statistics. Results: SyMPLES-CVL was not considered significantly more effective than SyMPLES-SMarty at an significance level of 0.05 for T-Test test. Limitations: Generalization of results is limited due to the sample size of this study. Conclusion: The results showed that the approaches compared did not have a significant difference in terms of effectiveness, although they use different means (annotative and compositional) for the management of variability in SPLs. Paper Category: Experimental and Technological.
机译:背景:软件产品线(SPL)是一组具有一组共同功能的系统,这些功能可以满足细分市场的特定需求。这些系统是从一组通用的核心资产中系统地开发的。目的:本文提出了SyMPLES-CVL,这是一种基于SysML模型的可变性管理的替代方法,以支持嵌入式系统SPL的开发。此外,我们在以前的方法SyMPLES-SMarty和SyMPLES-CVL之间进行了比较研究。方法:以SyMPLES-SMarty为基础确定SyMPLES-CVL,然后进行实验研究以比较方法。共有20名具有软件工程背景的参与者分为两组,每种方法一组。数据是在调查表的支持下收集的,调查表使用推论统计基于检验假设进行了分析。结果:在T检验测试的显着性水平为0.05时,SyMPLES-CVL被认为没有比SyMPLES-SMarty显着更有效。局限性:由于这项研究的样本量,结果的一般性受到限制。结论:结果表明,所比较的方法虽然在SPL变异性管理上使用不同的方法(注释和组成),但在有效性方面没有显着差异。论文类别:实验与技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号