首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics >Weighting Factor Mechanism of Uncited Papers to Improve the Fairness of RA-index based on Particle Swarm Optimization
【24h】

Weighting Factor Mechanism of Uncited Papers to Improve the Fairness of RA-index based on Particle Swarm Optimization

机译:基于粒子群优化改善铅作用的加权因子机制提高抗疟原虫的公平性

获取原文

摘要

Today, Clarivate Analysis (WoS), Scopus and Google Scholar use the H-Index method to figure the profile of the researchers. The advantages of the H-index are simple mathematic application and can be implemented in many areas. However, the H-index also has weaknesses, such as less sensitive to measure the impact of productive and perfectionist groups of researchers. Many proposals tried to improve the H-index method, such as the well-known G-index. H-index and G-index did not count the number of citations, which is the citations below the H-index value and do not count uncited papers to contribute the index value. This study proposes weighting on uncited papers and the number of citations below the H-index value (lower-h-tail area), as the data to be considered to be measured as an impact to differentiate researchers. The weighting is related to a new method of calculating the impact of the researcher from previous work, namely RA-index. The RA-Index method accommodates productive researchers based on Lotka's law and the Fairness Jain theory. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) method is used to optimize the weighting of the uncited papers. Weighted values for uncited papers and the number citation of papers with citation value of the H-index values obtained is 0.52. The result of discrimination test from the weighted value manually of 0.50 is 0.09, while the weighting of optimization results obtained is 0.08. From these results, it is concluded that the PSO method is feasible to be used in optimizing the weighting of the RA-Index method. The comparison results showed that the RA-Index is fairer than its competitors. The result of fairness calculation for RA-index (optimized) has fairness value of 0.92 higher than RA-index (not optimized) that has fairness value of 0.91.
机译:如今,克拉敏分析(WOS),Scopus和Google学者使用H-Index方法来解决研究人员的资料。 H-Index的优点是简单的数学应用,可以在许多领域实现。然而,H-Index也具有缺点,例如对测量研究人员的生产和完美主义团体的影响不太敏感。许多建议试图改善H-Index方法,例如众所周知的G折射率。 H-Index和G-Index没有计算引用的数量,这是H-Index值以下的引用,并且不计数未计算的文件以贡献索引值。本研究提出对未发现的文件和H级指数值(低H尾部)以下引文的数量加权,因为要被视为对区分研究人员的影响。加权与计算研究人员与之前的工作的影响的新方法有关,即RA-Index。 RA-Index方法基于Lotka法律和公平耆那教理论的高效研究人员。粒子群优化(PSO)方法用于优化未发现纸的加权。未获得的未发现纸的加权值和所得H折射率值的引文值的纸张的数量引用为0.52。从手动值为0.50的加权值的判别结果为0.09,而获得的优化结果的加权为0.08。从这些结果中,得出结论,PSO方法是可行的,用于优化RA指数方法的加权。比较结果表明,RA指数比其竞争对手更公平。对RA-INDEX(优化)的公平计算的结果具有比RA-INDEX(未优化)高0.92的公平值,其公平值为0.91。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号