首页> 外文会议>Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society >Comparison of methods for determining pulse arrival time from Doppler and photoplethysmography signals
【24h】

Comparison of methods for determining pulse arrival time from Doppler and photoplethysmography signals

机译:从多普勒和光电容积描记法信号确定脉冲到达时间的方法比较

获取原文

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare three foot-finding methods applied to ultrasound Doppler and photoplethysmographic (PPG) signals: maximum 1 derivative, maximum 2 derivative and an ‘intersecting tangents’ method. The pulse arrival times of each method were compared. Also the precision of each method was evaluated by comparing instantaneous cardiac periods derived using each method from simultaneous Doppler and PPG with a reference measurement: the R-R interval calculated from a simultaneously recorded ECG. The results show that the maximum 1st derivative method produced significantly larger pulse arrival times than the other two methods. The intersecting tangents method produced greatest precision for cardiac periods compared with ECG than maximum 1 or 2 derivatives for both Doppler (r = 0.975) and PPG (r = 0.987) signals.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较应用于超声多普勒和光电容积描记(PPG)信号的三种脚部寻找方法:最大1个导数,最大2个导数和“相切切线”法。比较每种方法的脉冲到达时间。同样,通过比较使用每种方法从同时多普勒和PPG得出的瞬时心动周期与参考测量值(从同时记录的ECG计算得出的R-R间隔)来评估每种方法的精度。结果表明,最大的一阶导数方法产生的脉冲到达时间明显大于其他两种方法。与ECG相比,相切线法在心动周期上产生的精度最高,而多普勒(r = 0.975)和PPG(r = 0.987)信号的最大导数是1或2个导数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号