首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the International Society of Exposure Science >Exposure to PM2.5, Ultrafine and Black Carbon Particles in Green vs. Non-Green Homes
【24h】

Exposure to PM2.5, Ultrafine and Black Carbon Particles in Green vs. Non-Green Homes

机译:在绿色和非绿色房屋中暴露于PM2.5,超细和黑碳颗粒

获取原文

摘要

Environmental concerns for improved energy consumption are driving a green building/remodeling movement. Energy conservation efforts have resulted in tighter buildings, which have led to a reduction in the air exchange rates between indoor and outdoor environments. Poor air exchange rates could lead to an increase in particles that often originate from indoor sources (tobacco smoke, cooking), but decrease particles from outdoor sources (traffic, combustion). We assessed the concentration of particles alongside air exchange rates (AER) in 30 non-green and 27 green homes. Particles ≤ 2.5 μm (PM2.5) were sampled on 37 mm, 2.0 μm pore-size PTFE membrane filters using single-stage Personal Modular Impactors (SKC, Inc.) and analyzed gravimetrically. In addition, real-time number concentrations of ultrafine particles and mass concentrations of black carbon were assessed using a P-Trak condensation nuclei counter (TSI Inc.) and microAeth® monitors (AethLabs), respectively. Capillary adsorption tubes (CAT) and sources were placed in different locations of the homes to determine the AER. Information on home characteristics was collected by questionnaires. At baseline (immediately post renovation) the AER was significantly higher (p=0.02) in non-green homes (median=3.1 h-1) as compared to green homes (median=1.1 h-1). The geometric mean of PM2.5 was 80 μg.m-3 in green homes and 56 μg.m-3 in non-green homes (p=0.1) and the geometric mean of the number concentration of ultrafine particles was 26087 cm-3 in green homes and 32535 cm-3 in non-green homes (p=0.2). Preliminary data show a higher concentration of ultrafine particles in green homes at 6 months (p=0.05) and at 12 months (p=0.3). Black carbon, which was measured only at 12 months, showed an increasing trend (p=0.06) in non-green homes. Further data analysis will tease out the influence of human activity versus the renovation status of homes.
机译:对环境的关注,以改善能源消耗正在推动绿色建筑/改建运动。节能努力导致建筑物更加紧凑,从而导致室内和室外环境之间的空气交换率降低。较差的空气交换速率可能导致通常源自室内(烟草烟雾,烹饪)的颗粒物增加,但来自室外(交通,燃烧)的颗粒物减少。我们评估了30个非绿色家庭和27个绿色家庭中颗粒物的浓度以及空气交换率(AER)。使用单级个人模块化冲击器(SKC,Inc.)在37 mm,2.0μm孔径的PTFE膜过滤器上采样≤2.5μm(PM2.5)的颗粒,并进行重量分析。此外,分别使用P-Trak凝聚核计数器(TSI Inc.)和microAeth®监测器(AethLabs)评估了超细颗粒的实时数量浓度和黑碳的质量浓度。毛细管吸附管(CAT)和离子源分别放置在房屋的不同位置,以确定AER。通过问卷调查收集有关家庭特征的信息。在基线时(装修后立即),与绿色房屋(中位数= 1.1 h-1)相比,非绿色房屋(中位数= 3.1 h-1)中的AER显着更高(p = 0.02)。 PM2.5的几何平均值在绿色家庭中为80μg.m-3,在非绿色家庭中为56μg.m-3(p = 0.1),超细颗粒数浓度的几何平均值为26087 cm-3在绿色房屋中为32535 cm-3,在非绿色房屋中为32535 cm-3(p = 0.2)。初步数据显示,在6个月(p = 0.05)和12个月(p = 0.3)的绿色家庭中,超细颗粒的浓度较高。仅在12个月时测得的黑碳在非绿色家庭中呈上升趋势(p = 0.06)。进一步的数据分析将弄清人类活动对房屋翻新状况的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号