首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the International Society of Exposure Science >A Pilot Study Evaluating Changes to Household Emissions and Health Risk Following Indonesia's Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) Conversion Program
【24h】

A Pilot Study Evaluating Changes to Household Emissions and Health Risk Following Indonesia's Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) Conversion Program

机译:评估印度尼西亚液化石油气(LPG)转换计划后家庭排放和健康风险变化的初步研究

获取原文

摘要

Background In 2007, the Indonesian government implemented a strategy to remove a 40-year old national subsidy on kerosene across most areas of the country. This subsidy, used by 50 million households to meet daily cooking and lighting needs, was replaced with an unconditional subsidy on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). The motivation for this transition was economic: less LPG could be subsidized to meet public energy demand. However, since the transition began, evidence has emerged elsewhere on the human health and environment risks from household kerosene. Whether the Indonesian transition from kerosene to LPG has had unanticipated co-benefits due to reductions in exposures to health-damaging pollutants and emissions has not been formally evaluated. Aims To provide the first estimates of the Indonesian kerosene to LPG subsidy transition impacts on household pollutant emissions and human health risks for selected outcomes. Methods Household surveys were administered to 400 households within a sub-district of Yogayakarta, Indonesia, to determine fuel use habits before and after the LPG transition. In 100 households, 3-day Kitchen Performance Tests and stove-use monitoring were conducted to evaluate fuel use rates. In-house cookstove emissions were measured in 15 households representing stove and fuel combinations typical of the region. Results and Conclusions Household surveys in the study region indicated that prior to the subsidy change, 76% of surveyed houses used kerosene as their main cooking fuel. By 2012, this had fallen to 7%, in favor of LPG (79%). Charcoal-using households rose from 8% to 10% following the transition, with the increase attributable to an elderly sub-population. Although 40% of houses use subsidized fuel for small-scale businesses, they constitute 65-70% of demand. Estimates of changes to population health risks and pollutant emissions will be presented. Understanding of the effectiveness of Indonesia's conversion to LPG may provide guidance for nations considering eliminating or reducing kerosene subsidies or its use.
机译:背景技术2007年,印度尼西亚政府实施了一项战略,取消了该国大部分地区40年以上的国家对煤油的补贴。这项补贴被5000万个家庭用来满足日常烹饪和照明需求,被无条件的液化石油气(LPG)补贴所取代。过渡的动机是经济的:可以补贴较少的LPG以满足公共能源需求。但是,自从过渡开始以来,其他地方已经出现了有关家用煤油对人类健康和环境造成的风险的证据。印尼从煤油向液化石油气的过渡是否由于减少了危害健康的污染物和排放物的暴露而产生了意料之外的共同收益,目前尚未得到正式评估。目的为选定结果提供印度尼西亚煤油向液化石油气的补贴过渡对家庭污染物排放和人类健康风险的影响的初步估计。方法对印度尼西亚瑜珈雅加达分区内的400户家庭进行家庭调查,以确定LPG过渡前后的燃料使用习惯。在100户家庭中,进行了为期3天的厨房性能测试和炉灶使用监测,以评估燃料使用率。对15个家庭的室内灶具排放进行了测量,代表了该地区典型的炉灶和燃料组合。结果与结论研究区域的家庭调查表明,在补贴变更之前,有76%的被调查房屋使用煤油作为主要烹饪燃料。到2012年,这一比例下降到7%,而LPG(79%)受到青睐。过渡之后,使用木炭的家庭从8%上升到10%,这归因于老年人群。尽管40%的房屋使用补贴的燃料用于小型企业,但它们占需求的65-70%。将提出人口健康风险和污染物排放变化的估计值。了解印度尼西亚向液化石油气转化的有效性可能为考虑取消或减少煤油补贴或其使用的国家提供指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号