首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the International Society of Exposure Science >Understanding health related behaviours and beliefs in north-west Tanzania; environmental health knowledges and coping strategies
【24h】

Understanding health related behaviours and beliefs in north-west Tanzania; environmental health knowledges and coping strategies

机译:了解坦桑尼亚西北部健康相关行为和信仰;环境健康知识和应对策略

获取原文

摘要

Background: This article draws on a socio-cultural perspective to analyse public perceptions of health risks, which are based on complex interactions between social and cultural factors within a particular social space. This approach challenges traditional bio-medical and scientific approaches to understanding health related behaviours. The article discusses how local communities perceive risks, and draws out the important distinction between 'risk' (the event) and vulnerability (the social context of that risk), providing a justification for the socio-cultural approach to health. This exploration then leads into a discussion of knowledge, or information, assumptions and judgements that inform health related decisions. Aim: To explores the way people make sense of of environmental health risks based on experiences. We address the following research questions: (1) What are the perceptions and beliefs of rural citizens regarding factors that produce or prevent health? (2) How is the socio-cultural perspective important in understanding and theorizing environmentally related health? Methodology: Ethnographic research including participant observation, focus groups and in-depth interviews. Analysis and interpretation of data employed ground theory based on emergent themes. Results and conclusions: Generally, results show that individuals respond purposeful so that to safeguard their social and cultural values. In order to achieve that villagers use different approaches such as comparative judgement (compare themselves with more resilient individuals or animals); fatalism (when challenges are felt inevitable), and internalising risks (a sense of personal or social invulnerability). Our finding sheds light on why local people sometimes reject, ignore or manipulate health interventions in a manner that seems, from an external scientific perspective, to be 'illogical'.
机译:背景:本文借鉴了社会文化视角,分析了对健康风险的公众看法,这是基于特定社会空间内社会和文化因素之间的复杂相互作用。这种方法挑战传统的生物医学和科学方法,了解健康相关行为。本文讨论了局域社区如何感知风险,并阐述“风险”(事件)和漏洞(该风险的社会背景)之间的重要区别,为健康的社会文化方法提供了理由。然后,这种探索导致了对知识,信息,假设和判断的讨论,这些探讨了与健康相关决定的信息,假设和判断。目的:探讨人们根据经验造成环境健康风险的方式。我们解决以下研究问题:(1)农村公民有关产生或预防健康的因素的看法和信仰是什么? (2)社会文化视角如何在理解和理论上有环境相关的健康方面很重要?方法论:民族志研究包括参与者观察,焦点小组和深入访谈。基于紧急主题的地面理论的数据分析与解释。结果和结论:一般来说,结果表明,个人响应有目的地,以保护其社会和文化价值观。为了实现村民使用不同的方法,例如比较判断(与更多有弹性的个体或动物进行比较);致命主义(当感到不可避免的挑战时)和内部风险(个人或社会无拘可的感觉)。我们的发现揭示了为什么当地人有时拒绝,忽视或以似乎从外部科学的角度来忽略健康干预措施,从外部科学的角度来看,成为“不合逻辑”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号