首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the International Society of Exposure Science >Are we sending mixed messages to remote indigenous communities? Water for healthy living versus water conservation
【24h】

Are we sending mixed messages to remote indigenous communities? Water for healthy living versus water conservation

机译:我们是否向远程土着社区发送混合信息?健康生活的水与水养护

获取原文

摘要

< Significant expenditure on water services to Indigenous communities in Australia has led to above average water use in areas where surface water is minimal and aquifers variable. In some parts supplies are not sustainable beyond a decade. Given these and climate change constraints there is a need for efficient use of water. Thus the authors were tasked with designing a conservation strategy suitable for such communities. One aim of the study was to document residents' water conservation behaviours. However, there is a significant gap between the health of Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians; life expectancy is 17 years less for Indigenous people. Infant mortality is 12 deaths/1000 live births in the Indigenous population compared to 4 deaths in the non-Indigenous population. Water-washed diseases are disproportionately high, with Australia the only developed country still to have blinding trachoma. Given this health context a second aim of the study was to assess whether water consumption in two remote Indigenous communities in South Australia was adequate for healthy living. Water conservation data were obtained via focus groups in 2011; actual consumption data for a 5-year period were obtained from the service provider. The work of Nganampa Health Council (1987) and Pholeros et al. (1997) were used to benchmark the water requirements for healthy living. Adapting their figures to account for housing occupancy yielded a range of 101-456 litres/person/day. Water use in Mimili was above the minimum level required for healthy living but did not exceed the maximum amount. The higher water use occurred during summer. In Amata water use was high (470-616 litres) during summer but for the remainder of the year was <453 litres/person/day. Given the vulnerability of water resources there is a need for conservation programmes but it is important that they do not undermine the health improvements made in the last decade.
机译:<澳大利亚土着社区的水资源支出的显着支出导致了在地表水是最小的和含水层变量的地区的平均水平。在某些部件中,耗材不超过十年。鉴于这些和​​气候变化的限制有需要有效地使用水。因此,作者的任务是设计适合此类社区的保护策略。该研究的一个目的是记录居民的水资源保护行为。但是,土着和非土着澳大利亚人的健康之间存在显着差距;为土着人民预期寿命为17岁。婴儿死亡率为土着人群中的12人死亡,而非土着人口中的4人死亡率相比。水洗疾病较高,澳大利亚唯一的发达国家仍然具有致盲的沙眼。鉴于这种健康背景研究的第二个目的是评估南澳大利亚两家远程土着社区的水消耗是否足以健康生活。通过2011年通过焦点组获得水资源保护数据;从服务提供商获得5年期间的实际消费数据。 Nganampa卫生委员会(1987)和Pholeros等人的工作。 (1997)用于基准对健康生活的水要求。调整他们的数据以考虑住房占用,产生的范围为101-456升/人/一天。 Mimili的用水量高于健康生活所需的最低水平,但不超过最高金额。夏季发生了较高的用水。在夏季,艾达水域使用很高(470-616升),但今年的剩余时间是<453升/人/天。鉴于水资源的脆弱性,需要保护计划,但重要的是他们不会破坏过去十年的健康改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号