首页> 外文会议>International symposium on transportation and traffic theory >A Process Model for Route Choice in Risky Traffic Networks
【24h】

A Process Model for Route Choice in Risky Traffic Networks

机译:风险交通网络中路径选择的过程模型

获取原文

摘要

The accurate modeling of travelers' route choice decision making when faced with unreliable (risky) travel times is necessary for the assessment of policies aimed at improving travel time reliability. Compared with econometric models, process models have not been investigated in travel decision making under risk. A process model aims to describe the actual decision making procedure and could potentially provide a better explanation to route choice behavior. A process model, the priority heuristic (Brandstatter et al. , 2006), is introduced to the travel choice context and its probabilistic version, the probabilistic priority heuristic (PPH) model, is developed in this study. With data collected from a stated preference survey, a rank-dependent expected utility (RDEU) model and two other alternative models are compared with the PPH model through cross validation. Results showed that the PPH model outperforms the RDEU model in both data-fitting and predictive performances. This suggests that the process modeling paradigm could be a promising new area in travel behavior research. Major drawbacks of the PPH model include the discontinuity of the choice probability with respect to outcomes and associated probabilities, the limited applicability in situations where one alternative dominates or almost dominates the other, and the non-trivial extension to multiple-alternative situations.
机译:面对不可靠(危险)的旅行时间时,对旅行者的路线选择决策进行准确的建模对于评估旨在提高旅行时间可靠性的政策非常必要。与计量经济学模型相比,尚未在风险下的差旅决策中研究过程模型。过程模型旨在描述实际的决策过程,并可能为路线选择行为提供更好的解释。一个过程模型,优先级启发式(Brandstatter等人,2006年)被引入到出行选择上下文中,并在此研究中开发了其概率版本,即概率优先级启发式(PPH)模型。通过陈述的偏好调查收集的数据,通过交叉验证将等级相关的预期效用(RDEU)模型和其他两个替代模型与PPH模型进行了比较。结果表明,PPH模型在数据拟合和预测性能方面均优于RDEU模型。这表明过程建模范式可能成为旅行行为研究中一个有希望的新领域。 PPH模型的主要缺点包括:选择概率相对于结果和相关概率而言是不连续的;在一种替代方案主导或几乎主导另一种替代方案的情况下,适用性有限;以及对多种替代方案的非平凡扩展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号