首页> 外文会议>International conference on nuclear engineering >SHIELDING CALCULATION RESEARCH BASED ON POINT-KERNEL INTEGRAL METHOD
【24h】

SHIELDING CALCULATION RESEARCH BASED ON POINT-KERNEL INTEGRAL METHOD

机译:基于点核积分法的屏蔽计算研究

获取原文

摘要

Point-kernel integral method, which has been verified by authorities, is widely used in radiation shielding calculations. In this article, we introduced point-kernel integral method in detail. Calculations have been performed for the radiation shielding design of TEG (gaseous waste processing system) system of one Chinese CRP1000 reactor, using the point-kernel integral codes QAD-CGA and Microshield 9. Dose results calculated by the two representative codes are compared from several aspects. We also focus our discussion on the impact of buildup factors that are fitted by different kinds of methods, which are the most important parameters in point-kernel integral method. From the discussion in this article, we can draw the conclusions that 1)both of the two codes are of accurate and consistent calculation results, shielding calculation results are convinced; Microshield 9 proved to be reasonably reliable compared to results of traditional code QAD-CGA; 2) compared with QAD-CGA, Microshield 9 uses the latest database and simpler input form, but cannot calculate more than one source at one time; 3) buildup factor plays the most important role in point-kernel integral method; the two codes adopt different kinds of buildup factor fitting method; for the difference of dose calculation results using buildup factor or not, QAD-CGA is a little higher than Microshield 9 because of the different buildup factor calculation principles; 4) besides, the buildup factor reference material is advised to use either the last or the most dominant shielding.
机译:经核实的点核积分法已广泛用于辐射屏蔽计算中。在本文中,我们详细介绍了点核积分方法。使用点核积分代码QAD-CGA和Microshield 9对一台中国CRP1000反应堆的TEG(气态废物处理系统)系统的辐射屏蔽设计进行了计算。方面。我们还将讨论的重点放在通过各种方法拟合的堆积因子的影响上,这些方法是点核积分方法中最重要的参数。从本文的讨论中,我们可以得出以下结论:1)两种代码均具有准确一致的计算结果,可以说服了屏蔽计算结果;与传统代码QAD-CGA的结果相比,Microshield 9被证明是相当可靠的; 2)与QAD-CGA相比,Microshield 9使用最新的数据库和更简单的输入形式,但一次不能计算多个源; 3)累积因子在点核积分法中起着最重要的作用;这两个代码采用不同的建立因子拟合方法;无论是否使用累积因子进行剂量计算结果的差异,由于累积因子计算原理不同,QAD-CGA略高于Microshield 9。 4)此外,建议堆积因子参考材料使用最后或最主要的屏蔽层。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号