首页> 外文会议>National Symposium on Remote Sensing of China >Comparison of three empirical methods for water depth mapping with case study of Pratas Island
【24h】

Comparison of three empirical methods for water depth mapping with case study of Pratas Island

机译:Pratas Island案例研究水深绘图三种实证方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Statistical methods to map water depth from medium-high resolution multispectral images were easier and more popular than wave spectrum bathymetry or water scattering-based implementation. However, less studies compared the effectiveness of the popular statistical methods for pelagic islands. This study used the Log ratio transform, primary component analysis and independent component analysis methods to retrieve water depth of Pratas Island, using one Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) image. Results showed that the Log ratio transformation was not the best method as the proposer suggested. The first primary component and the second independent component are good predictors for absolute water depth ranging from 0 to 20m, while Log Ratio was more sensitive to water depth ranging from 0 to 5m, IC2 was sensitive to water depth between 5 and 10 m.
机译:从中高分辨率MultiSpectral图像映射水深的统计方法比波谱沐浴浴或基于水散射的实现更容易且更流行。然而,较少的研究比较了Pelagic岛的流行统计方法的有效性。本研究使用了日志比变换,主要分量分析和独立分量分析方法来检索Pratas岛的水深,使用一个Landsat 8运行陆地成像器(OLI)图像。结果表明,随着拟议者的建议,日志比转换不是最好的方法。第一主要组分和第二个独立组分是绝对水深度范围为0至20米的良好预测因子,而日志比对水深度的敏感性范围为0至5M,IC2对5至10μm的水深敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号