首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems >Automatic Fine-Grained Issue Report Reclassification
【24h】

Automatic Fine-Grained Issue Report Reclassification

机译:自动细化问题报告重新分类

获取原文

摘要

Issue tracking systems are valuable resources during software maintenance activities. These systems contain different categories of issue reports such as bug, request for improvement (RFE), documentation, refactoring, task etc. While logging issue reports into a tracking system, reporters can indicate the category of the reports. Herzig et al. Recently reported that more than 40% of issue reports are given wrong categories in issue tracking systems. Among issue reports that are marked as bugs, more than 30% of them are not bug reports. The misclassification of issue reports can adversely affects developers as they then need to manually identify the categories of various issue reports. To address this problem, in this paper we propose an automated technique that reclassifies an issue report into an appropriate category. Our approach extracts various feature values from a bug report and predicts if a bug report needs to be reclassified and its reclassified category. We have evaluated our approach to reclassify more than 7,000 bug reports from HTTP Client, Jackrabbit, Lucene-Java, Rhino, and Tomcat 5 into 1 out of 13 categories. Our experiments show that we can achieve a weighted precision, recall, and F1 (F-measure) score in the ranges of 0.58-0.71, 0.61-0.72, and 0.57-0.71 respectively. In terms of F1, which is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, our approach can substantially outperform several baselines by 28.88%-416.66%.
机译:在软件维护活动期间,问题跟踪系统是宝贵的资源。这些系统包含不同类别的问题报告,例如错误,改进请求(RFE),文档,重构,任务等。在将问题报告记录到跟踪系统中时,报告者可以指示报告的类别。 Herzig等。最近报道,超过40%的问题报告在问题跟踪系统中被归为错误类别。在标记为错误的问题报告中,超过30%的不是错误报告。问题报告的错误分类会对开发人员产生不利影响,因为他们随后需要手动识别各种问题报告的类别。为了解决这个问题,在本文中,我们提出了一种自动技术,可以将问题报告重新分类为适当的类别。我们的方法从错误报告中提取各种功能值,并预测是否需要对错误报告及其类别进行重新分类。我们评估了将来自HTTP Client,Jackrabbit,Lucene-Java,Rhino和Tomcat 5的7,000多个错误报告重新分类为13个类别中的1个类别的方法。我们的实验表明,我们可以在0.58-0.71、0.61-0.72和0.57-0.71的范围内分别获得加权精度,查全率和F1(F测度)评分。就F1而言,F1是精度和召回率的谐波平均值,我们的方法可以大大优于多个基准28.88%-416.66%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号