首页> 外文会议>International conference on structures under shock and impact >Analysis of the field test results of ammonium nitrate: fuel oil explosives as improvised explosive device charges
【24h】

Analysis of the field test results of ammonium nitrate: fuel oil explosives as improvised explosive device charges

机译:硝酸铵野外试验结果分析:燃料油爆炸物作为简易爆炸装置收费

获取原文

摘要

When the over pressure of a blast wave is calculated and its effects on valuated objects are set, many approximations are used. Basic relationships, used to calculate the maximum blast overpressure, safety distances and building damage, are created for industrial accidents or for objects where explosives and munitions are stored. This method is invalid in public spaces. More than 95% of all terrorist attacks are carried out using ANFO (ammonium nitrate - fuel oil) explosives in three different variants (ammonium nitrate with oil, ammonium nitrate with oil and aluminium powder or ammonium nitrate with oil and trinitrotoluene (TNT)).The commonly used method to calculate the overpressure uses a scaled distance. The value of the scaled distance is derived from heat created by combustion. A theoretical value for the combustion heat of an industrial-produced ANFO explosion does not represent the real history of explosion or the size of overpressure. For example, the heat of combustion of Slovak-produced DAP-E is the same as TNT. From the relationship used, it emerges that the explosions have the same capacity. We have conducted more than 130 field tests of the ANFO explosive, where the history of blast wave was recorded. The results of the measurements clearly show the invalidity of this theory. The values of the calculated and measured overpressure are significantly different. It is necessary to choose a different approach for the TNT equivalent method. In the first part of this paper, we present the results of the conducted field tests. The experimental results are analysed using commonly-used methods. At the end of our paper we present a new relationship, used to calculate the maximum blast overpressure, which is based on the measured overpressure. This paper presents the results of scientific research at the Faculty of Special Engineering, University of Zilina.
机译:当计算出爆发波的过压并设定对估值对象的影响时,使用许多近似。用于计算最大爆破过压,安全距离和建筑物损坏的基本关系是为工业事故或存储爆炸物和弹药的物体而产生的。该方法在公共空间中无效。在三种不同的变体中使用ANFO(硝酸铵 - 燃料油)爆炸物(用油,硝酸铵用油和铝粉末或硝酸铵用油和三硝基甲苯(TNT))进行超过95%的恐怖主义攻击。计算过压的常用方法使用缩放距离。缩放距离的值衍生自燃烧产生的热量。工业生产的ANFO爆炸的燃烧热的理论价值并不代表过压的真正爆炸史或大小。例如,斯洛伐克制造的DAP-E的燃烧热与TNT相同。从所使用的关系中,它出现了爆炸具有相同的容量。我们对ANFO爆炸性进行了130多个现场测试,其中记录了爆炸波的历史。测量结果明确显示了该理论的无效性。计算和测量的超压的值显着不同。有必要为TNT等效方法选择不同的方法。在本文的第一部分,我们介绍了进行的现场测试的结果。使用普通使用的方法分析实验结果。在本文结束时,我们提出了一种新的关系,用于计算基于测量的超压的最大爆炸过压。本文介绍了Zilina大学特种工程学院科学研究的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号