首页> 外文会议>International conference on structures under shock and impact >Analysis of the field test results of ammonium nitrate: fuel oil explosives as improvised explosive device charges
【24h】

Analysis of the field test results of ammonium nitrate: fuel oil explosives as improvised explosive device charges

机译:硝酸铵作为简易爆炸装置装药的燃料炸药的现场测试结果分析

获取原文

摘要

When the over pressure of a blast wave is calculated and its effects on valuated objects are set, many approximations are used. Basic relationships, used to calculate the maximum blast overpressure, safety distances and building damage, are created for industrial accidents or for objects where explosives and munitions are stored. This method is invalid in public spaces. More than 95% of all terrorist attacks are carried out using ANFO (ammonium nitrate - fuel oil) explosives in three different variants (ammonium nitrate with oil, ammonium nitrate with oil and aluminium powder or ammonium nitrate with oil and trinitrotoluene (TNT)).The commonly used method to calculate the overpressure uses a scaled distance. The value of the scaled distance is derived from heat created by combustion. A theoretical value for the combustion heat of an industrial-produced ANFO explosion does not represent the real history of explosion or the size of overpressure. For example, the heat of combustion of Slovak-produced DAP-E is the same as TNT. From the relationship used, it emerges that the explosions have the same capacity. We have conducted more than 130 field tests of the ANFO explosive, where the history of blast wave was recorded. The results of the measurements clearly show the invalidity of this theory. The values of the calculated and measured overpressure are significantly different. It is necessary to choose a different approach for the TNT equivalent method. In the first part of this paper, we present the results of the conducted field tests. The experimental results are analysed using commonly-used methods. At the end of our paper we present a new relationship, used to calculate the maximum blast overpressure, which is based on the measured overpressure. This paper presents the results of scientific research at the Faculty of Special Engineering, University of Zilina.
机译:计算爆炸波的超压并设置其对评估对象的影响时,将使用许多近似值。对于工业事故或存储炸药和弹药的物体,创建了用于计算最大爆炸超压,安全距离和建筑物破坏的基本关系。此方法在公共场所无效。超过95%的恐怖袭击是使用三种不同变体(硝酸铵加油,硝酸铵加油和铝粉或硝酸铵加油和三硝基甲苯(TNT))的ANFO(硝酸铵-燃料油)炸药进行的。计算超压的常用方法是按比例缩放距离。标定距离的值来自燃烧产生的热量。工业生产的ANFO爆炸的燃烧热的理论值并不代表爆炸的真实历史或超压的大小。例如,斯洛伐克生产的DAP-E的燃烧热与TNT相同。从所使用的关系中可以看出,爆炸具有相同的能力。我们对ANFO炸药进行了130多次现场测试,记录了爆炸波的历史。测量结果清楚地表明了该理论的无效性。计算和测量的过压值明显不同。对于TNT等效方法,必须选择其他方法。在本文的第一部分,我们介绍了进行的现场测试的结果。实验结果采用常用方法进行分析。在本文的最后,我们提出了一种新的关系,该关系用于基于测得的超压来计算最大爆炸超压。本文介绍了Zilina大学特殊工程学院的科学研究成果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号