首页> 外文会议>Annual IEEE International Systems Conference >Systems engineering decision-making: Optimizing and/or satisficing?
【24h】

Systems engineering decision-making: Optimizing and/or satisficing?

机译:系统工程决策:优化和/或令人满意?

获取原文

摘要

Not all systems are the same: consequently they need different management approaches. The varied typology of systems is not always universally recognized. One way in which systems can vary is in terms of complexity; and there is increasing awareness about growing complexity in systems across a number of literature domains. Complexity is now an evolving topic in systems engineering (SE). However, traditional SE has tended to address all systems with the same approach, moving from the premise that activities and their interrelationships are linear and measurable. Recently there has been a paradigm shift in the way systems are understood, with the recognition of their nonlinear and emergent properties. Traditionally optimization has been the primary method of decision-making. When dealing with complexity, true optimization is not always possible: therefore satisficing was introduced. Selecting and applying these two very different approaches is proving to be a challenging task for engineering practitioners. This paper explores SE decision-making in dealing with different types of systems with various degrees of complexity and proposes a decision-making methodology which can assist engineering managers with the selection of optimizing versus satisficing in a given situation or problem space.
机译:并非所有系统都是一样的:因此他们需要不同的管理方法。系统的各种类型没有总是普遍认可的。系统可以变化的一种方式是复杂性;并且越来越意识到在许多文学领域的系统中产生复杂性。复杂性现在是系统工程中的一种不断发展的主题(SE)。然而,传统的SE已经倾向于解决具有相同方法的所有系统,从活动和相互关系的前提下移动是线性和可衡量的。最近,已经理解了系统的范式转变,识别其非线性和紧急性质。传统上优化一直是决策的主要方法。处理复杂性时,并不总是可能的真实优化:因此介绍了令人满意的。选择和应用这两种截然不同的方法是为工程师从业者提供具有挑战性的任务。本文探讨了在处理不同类型的系统中进行各种类型的系统,并提出了一种决策方法,可以帮助工程管理者选择优化在给定情况或问题空间中的优化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号