首页> 外文会议>China satellite navigation conference >Comparison of IRI-2012 and Rapid GIMs With GNSS-Derived TEC Over China
【24h】

Comparison of IRI-2012 and Rapid GIMs With GNSS-Derived TEC Over China

机译:IRI-2012和带有GNSS的TEC的快速GIM在中国的比较

获取原文

摘要

The ionospheric delay is one of the predominant errors limiting the accuracy of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), especially for single-frequency users. Meanwhile the IGS (International GNSS Service) Ionospheric Working Group and International Reference Ionosphere play an essential role in promoting ionospheric studies. This contribution will analyze the performance of IGS rapid Global Ionospheric Maps (GIMs) and the latest version International Reference Ionosphere model IRI-2012 aiming to provide more valid ionospheric correction in China. Three pairs of stations from CMONOC (Crustal Movement Observation Network of China) in 2013 are employed to analyze the discrepancy between rapid GIMs, IRI-2012 and GNSS-derived TEC. Results show that the rapid GIMs and IRI-2012 have distinct difference from GPS-derived TEC both in daytime and nighttime. In terms of rapid GIMs, the performance over IGS stations is generally better than those are non IGS stations, with pronouncedly better accuracy of about 20 and 50 % in daytime and nighttime respectively with respect to GNSS-derived TEC. Moreover, IRI-2012 is likely to overestimate TEC value in daytime, and underestimate TEC value in nighttime.
机译:电离层延迟是限制全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)准确性的主要误差之一,特别是对于单频用户而言。同时,IGS(国际GNSS服务)电离层工作组和国际参考电离层在促进电离层研究方面起着至关重要的作用。该文稿将分析IGS快速全球电离层地图(GIM)的性能以及最新版本的国际参考电离层模型IRI-2012,旨在在中国提供更有效的电离层校正。 2013年,使用了CMONOC(中国地壳运动观测网络)的三对台站来分析快速GIM,IRI-2012和GNSS派生的TEC之间的差异。结果表明,无论白天还是黑夜,快速GIM和IRI-2012与GPS衍生的TEC都有明显的区别。就快速GIM而言,IGS台站上的性能通常要优于非IGS台站,相对于GNSS派生的TEC,其白天和夜间的准确度要高得多,分别约为20%和50%。此外,IRI-2012可能在白天高估TEC值,而在夜间低估TEC值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号