【24h】

Is Agile Too Fragile for Space-Based Systems Engineering?

机译:敏捷太脆弱,适用于基于空间的系统工程吗?

获取原文

摘要

High safety and performance requirements drive the mission criticality of space exploration systems. There is often only one chance for mission success, and failure can be fatal. Although proximate causes of failure are often technical, root causes are usually mismanagement of the social context, leading to human error. Thus, while needing to maintain safety standards and faced with budgetary cuts and industry globalization, the space industry is driven to consider alternate methodologies by which to achieve success and limit failure. While Agile practices produce much interest within all aspects of mission-critical systems engineering, there is not much supporting data with respect to specific applicability of practices within the space industry. The need to review space-based systems engineering methodologies and to contemplate the applicability of disparate software engineering techniques, such as Agile, motivates the following research objective: The goal of this research is to identify which Agile practices, if any, are desirable and suitable for space-based systems engineering. Although some Agile practices may be discarded outright, others seem quite useful and should be given consideration. Scrum and extreme Programming (XP) show particular potential as does practicing hybrid approaches that combine Agile practices with existing formal methodologies and engineering standards.
机译:高安全性和性能要求推动了太空勘探系统的关键词。经常只有一个机会取得成功,并且失败可能是致命的。虽然失败的近似原因通常是技术性的,但根本原因通常是社会背景的不安,导致人为错误。因此,在需要维护安全标准并面临预算削减和行业全球化,航天工业被驱动为考虑替代方法,以实现成功和限制失败。虽然敏捷实践在关键任务系统工程的所有方面产生了很多兴趣,但对于空间行业内的实践的具体适用性并未提供多大的支持数据。需要审查基于空间的系统工程方法,并考虑不同的软件工程技术的适用性,例如敏捷,激励以下研究目标:本研究的目标是确定哪种敏捷实践(如果有的话)是理想的和合适的基于空间的系统工程。虽然一些敏捷实践可能会直立丢弃,但其他似乎非常有用,应该考虑。 Scrum和极端编程(XP)表明练习混合方法与现有的正式方法和工程标准相结合的混合方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号