首页> 外文会议>International conference on environmental odour monitoring and control >Comparison of Odorant Losses at the ppb-Level from Sampling Bags of Nalophan™ and Tedlar™ and from Adsorption Tubes
【24h】

Comparison of Odorant Losses at the ppb-Level from Sampling Bags of Nalophan™ and Tedlar™ and from Adsorption Tubes

机译:Nalophan™和Tedlar™采样袋以及吸附管在ppb级别的气味损失比较

获取原文

摘要

The issue of volatiles and odorant losses has already been addressed by different authors. The motivation came from the fields of breath analysis (Mochalski et al. 2013; Mochalski et al. 2009), atmospheric chemistry (Sulyok et al. 2001; Kim et al. 2012) and odour measurement (van Harreveld 2003; Hansen et al. 2011; Parker et al. 2010; Trabue et al. 2006). The aim in these fields is to collect samples for subsequent laboratory measurements. Frequently manufacturers of sample bags claim excellent stability of the stored substances. A closer look on the measurement procedure often shows an unrealistic background: The measurements were made with high concentrations of substances at an unrealistic level. The losses are different at a trace level, e.g. at the ppb-level near the odour thresholds of odorants, because the contribution of wall adsorption in the polymeric bags is comparatively greater. The published contributions show some general trends but often suffer from deficits of the measurement procedure. The initial losses due to adsorption at the walls of the bags contribute to a great extent to the losses. Therefore a measurement starting with the freshly filled bags as the reference level for losses does not reflect the real situation of bag sampling. Other obvious problems are the stability of the sample gas generation at trace level concentrations. The measurements for this study were made with a high sensitive trace gas measurement system. It uses online thermal desorption and a gas chromatography - time-of-flight mass spectrometry system. A calibration gas generator on basis of continuous evaporation and dilution has been used for the preparation of the sample gases in the ppb-range. Odorants from different chemical classes and of different molecular weight have been included in the study. Special care has been taken to avoid any losses due to leakage or cold spots in the measurement chain. Extensive measurements with different bag materials have been made, including the most common bags from Nalophan and from Tedlar. For comparison the same measurements have been made with adsorption tubes as a sampling method.
机译:不同作者已经解决了挥发物和增香剂损失的问题。动机来自以下领域:呼吸分析(Mochalski等,2013; Mochalski等,2009),大气化学(Sulyok等,2001; Kim等,2012)和气味测量(van Harreveld,2003; Hansen等,2008)。 2011; Parker等人2010; Trabue等人2006)。这些领域的目的是收集样本以用于随后的实验室测量。样品袋的制造商经常声称其所储存物质的稳定性极好。仔细观察测量程序通常会发现不切实际的背景:测量是在不切实际的水平上使用高浓度的物质进行的。损失在痕量水平上是不同的,例如在ppb浓度下,接近于气味剂的气味阈值,因为聚合物袋中壁吸附的贡献相对较大。已发表的论文显示了一些总体趋势,但经常遭受测量程序的缺陷。由于在袋壁上的吸附而引起的初始损失在很大程度上造成了损失。因此,以刚装满的袋子作为损失的参考水平开始的测量不能反映袋子采样的真实情况。其他明显的问题是在痕量浓度下生成样气的稳定性。本研究的测量是使用高灵敏度的痕量气体测量系统进行的。它使用在线热脱附和气相色谱-飞行时间质谱分析系统。已使用基于连续蒸发和稀释的校准气体发生器来制备ppb范围内的样品气体。来自不同化学类别和不同分子量的气味已包括在研究中。为了避免由于测量链中的泄漏或冷点而造成的任何损失,已经采取了特别的措施。已经使用不同的袋子材料进行了广泛的测量,包括最常见的Nalophan和Tedlar袋子。为了进行比较,使用吸附管作为采样方法进行了相同的测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号