首页> 外文会议>Cybercrime and Trustworthy Computing Workshop >ICANN or ICANT: Is WHOIS an Enabler of Cybercrime?
【24h】

ICANN or ICANT: Is WHOIS an Enabler of Cybercrime?

机译:ICANN或ICANT:WHOIS是网络犯罪的促成因素吗?

获取原文

摘要

WHOIS acts as a registry for organisations or individuals who "own" or take responsibility for domains. For any registry to be functional, its integrity needs to be assured. Unfortunately, WHOIS data does not appear to meet basic integrity requirements in many cases, reducing the effectiveness of law enforcement and rightsholders in requesting takedowns for phishing kits, zombie hosts that are part of a botnet, or infringing content. In this paper, we illustrate the problem using a case study from trademark protection, where investigators attempt to trace fake goods being advertised on Facebook. The results indicate that ICANN needs to at least introduce minimum verification standards for WHOIS records vis-à-vis integrity, and optimally, develop a system for rapid takedowns in the event that a domain is being misused.
机译:WHOIS充当“拥有”或负责域的组织或个人的注册机构。为了使任何注册表正常运行,需要确保其完整性。不幸的是,在许多情况下,WHOIS数据似乎不符合基本的完整性要求,从而降低了执法人员和权利持有者请求删除网络钓鱼工具包,僵尸网络中的僵尸主机或侵权内容的有效性。在本文中,我们使用商标保护的案例研究来说明这个问题,在此案例中,调查人员试图追踪在Facebook上刊登广告的假冒商品。结果表明,相对于完整性,ICANN至少需要为WHOIS记录引入最低验证标准,并且在域名被滥用的情况下,最佳地开发一套快速删除的系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号