【24h】

Which Centrality Metric for Which Terrorist Network Topology?

机译:哪个恐怖网络拓扑的中心度量?

获取原文

摘要

Recently, an exponential growth in the use of social network analysis (SNA) tools has been witnessed. SNA offers quantitative measures known as centralities which allow the identification of important nodes in a given network. In fact, determining such nodes in terrorist networks is a way to destabilize these cells and prevent their criminal activities. Identifying key players is highly dependent on structural characteristics of nodes. Therefore, many approaches rely on centrality metrics to propose various disruption strategies. Indeed, knowledge of these measures helps in revealing vulnerabilities of terrorist networks and may have important implications for investigations. It is debatable how to choose the suitable centrality measure that helps effectively to destabilize the terrorist network. In this paper, we aim to answer this question. We first provide an analytical study where we identify 6 topologies of terrorist networks and discuss the appropriate metrics per topology. Secondly, we provide the performed experimental analysis on five data sets (with 5 different topologies) to prove our analytical conclusions.
机译:最近,目睹了社交网络分析(SNA)工具的指数增长。 SNA提供称为中心的定量措施,其允许在给定网络中识别重要节点。事实上,确定恐怖主义网络中的这些节点是一种破坏这些细胞并防止其犯罪活动的方法。识别关键播放器高度依赖于节点的结构特征。因此,许多方法依靠中心度量来提出各种中断策略。实际上,了解这些措施有助于揭示恐怖主义网络的脆弱性,并且可能对调查有重要影响。这是如何选择合适的中心度措施,有助于有效地使恐怖网络稳定的衡量标准。在本文中,我们的目标是回答这个问题。我们首先提供了一个分析研究,我们确定了6个恐怖主义网络的拓扑,并讨论了每个拓扑的适当度量。其次,我们提供了对五个数据集(具有5种不同拓扑)的执行的实验分析,以证明我们的分析结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号