首页> 外文会议>Transportation Research Board Annual meeting >DOES RESIDENTIAL DISSONANCE IMPACT RESIDENTIAL MOBILITY?
【24h】

DOES RESIDENTIAL DISSONANCE IMPACT RESIDENTIAL MOBILITY?

机译:住宅不和谐会影响住宅的流动性吗?

获取原文

摘要

This research identifies residential mobility behaviour impacts of residential dissonance in Transit OrientedDevelopments (TODs) vs. non-TODs in Brisbane, Australia. Based on the characteristics of living environments(density, diversity, connectivity, and accessibility) and the travel preferences of 4545 individuals, respondents in2009 were classified into one of four categories including: TOD consonants, TOD dissonants, non-TODdissonants, and non-TOD consonants. Binary logistic regression analyses were employed to identify residentialmobility behaviour of groups between 2009 and 2011; controlling for time varying covariates. The findingsshow that both TOD dissonants and TOD consonants move residences at an equal rate. However, TODdissonants are more likely to move residences to their preferred non-TOD areas. In contrast, non-TODdissonants not only moved residences at a lower rate, but their rate of mobility to their preferred TODneighbourhood is also significantly lower due to costs and other associated factors. The findings suggest thatdiscrete land use policy development is required to integrate non-TOD dissonant and TOD dissonant behavioursto support TOD development in Brisbane.
机译:这项研究确定了公交导向行为中居民不和谐行为对居民流动行为的影响 澳大利亚布里斯班的发展(TOD)与非TOD。根据生活环境的特点 (密度,多样性,连通性和可访问性)以及4545位个人, 2009年被分为以下四类之一:TOD辅音,TOD异音,非TOD 和非TOD辅音。采用二元logistic回归分析来识别住宅 2009年至2011年期间各群体的流动行为;控制时变协变量。调查结果 表明,TOD辅音和TOD辅音均以相同的速率移动住所。但是,TOD 异议人士更有可能将住所移至其首选的非TOD地区。相反,非TOD 异议者不仅以较低的速度搬迁了住所,而且迁移了他们首选的TOD的比率 由于成本和其他相关因素,邻居也明显降低。研究结果表明 需要制定离散的土地使用政策,以整合非TOD不和谐行为和TOD不和谐行为 支持布里斯班TOD的开发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号