首页> 外文会议>Asian conference on remote sensing;ACRS >Investigation Verification of Airborne Lidar Error Based on Land Cover and Slope Variability
【24h】

Investigation Verification of Airborne Lidar Error Based on Land Cover and Slope Variability

机译:基于土地覆盖率和坡度变化的机载激光雷达误差调查与验证

获取原文

摘要

In this study, airborne lidar (ALS) errors investigation & verification was performed toward point cloud using 6566 bore holes as reference, where conventional ground survey methods were use to collects its coordinates. By subtract both data then will be afford the errors. Afterward, verification were conducted to produce 12,5m×12,5m raster grid correctors using spatial interpolation (IDW and kriging) and surface fitting (Polynomial-n) mathematical models. Finally, barely point cloud lidar will be applied to determine mine volume and its effectiveness compare to initial estimated volume. The result present that, als error value following land cover and slope variability, whereas error increased and accuracy decreased among high density vegetation and steep slope. The calculation of average error and accuracy were; (a) open area (-0.034 m ± 0.186 m), (b) shrubs (-0.2m ± 0.37 m), (c) low-density forest (-0.307 m ± 0.481 m), (d) forest medium density (-0.299 m ± 0.914 m), (e) high density forest (-0.458 m ± 0.54 m), (f) flat (-0.341 m ± 0.470 m), (g) slightly (-0.405 m ± 0.537 m), (h) moderate-steep (-0.383 m ± 0.597 m) and (i) steep (-0.357m ± 0.718 m). The most optimal verification models present that Kriging-land cover dataset model supplied the best result on accuracy and volume calculation, whereas the calculation of mine volume managed to increase the effectiveness reaches 94%.
机译:在这项研究中,以6566个钻孔为参考,对点云进行了机载激光雷达(ALS)错误调查和验证,其中使用了常规的地面测量方法来收集其坐标。通过将两个数据相减,将得到误差。之后,使用空间插值(IDW和kriging)和表面拟合(Polynomial-n)数学模型进行验证,以生产出12,5m×12,5m栅格网格校正器。最后,将使用勉强点云激光雷达来确定矿山数量,并将其有效性与初始估算数量进行比较。结果表明,在高密度植被和陡坡中,误差值随土地覆盖率和坡度变化而变化,而误差增加而精度下降。平均误差和准确度的计算分别为: (a)开阔面积(-0.034 m±0.186 m),(b)灌木(-0.2m±0.37 m),(c)低密度森林(-0.307 m±0.481 m),(d)森林中等密度( -0.299 m±0.914 m),(e)高密度森林(-0.458 m±0.54 m),(f)平坦(-0.341 m±0.470 m),(g)略微(-0.405 m±0.537 m),( h)中陡(-0.383 m±0.597 m)和(i)陡(-0.357m±0.718 m)。最优化的验证模型表明,克里格土地覆盖数据集模型在准确性和数量计算上提供了最佳结果,而矿山数量的计算设法提高了有效性,达到了94%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号