首页> 外文会议>ASME international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering >COMPARISON OF PLASTIC COLLAPSE SOLUTIONS FOR SURFACE BREAKING FLAWS IN STANDARD ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES WITH FEA
【24h】

COMPARISON OF PLASTIC COLLAPSE SOLUTIONS FOR SURFACE BREAKING FLAWS IN STANDARD ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES WITH FEA

机译:标准有限元分析程序中表面破裂缺陷的塑性倒塌解决方案比较

获取原文

摘要

Engineering Critical Assessment (ECA) procedures generally use the Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) concept for integrity assessment of components containing flaws. An FAD assessment is described by K_r and L_r values, where K_r reflects the toughness of the material while L_r measures the proximity to plastic collapse. Nowadays pipeline girth welds generally have high fracture toughness (K_(mat)) and it can be argued that plastic collapse is the governing failure mode. The definition of plastic collapse can affect the determination of the L_r parameter and should be carefully chosen. In the present work finite element analysis has been carried out to evaluate the collapse load under local collapse and global collapse conditions. These have been compared with the solutions available in the BS7910 and R6 procedures and the differences have been highlighted. The impact of the choice of plastic collapse solution on the crack driving force has been analysed.
机译:工程关键评估(ECA)程序通常使用故障评估图(FAD)概念对包含缺陷的组件进行完整性评估。 FAD评估由K_r和L_r值描述,其中K_r反映材料的韧性,而L_r衡量与塑料塌陷的接近程度。如今,管道环缝焊缝通常具有较高的断裂韧性(K_(mat)),可以说塑性塌陷是控制失效的主要方式。塑性塌陷的定义会影响L_r参数的确定,应谨慎选择。在目前的工作中,已经进行了有限元分析以评估局部塌陷和整体塌陷条件下的塌陷载荷。这些已与BS7910和R6程序中可用的解决方案进行了比较,并突出了差异。分析了塑料塌陷解决方案的选择对裂纹驱动力的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号