首页> 外文会议>Chinese Control and Decision Conference >Iterative algorithms for no-wait flowshop problems with sequence-dependent setup times
【24h】

Iterative algorithms for no-wait flowshop problems with sequence-dependent setup times

机译:具有序列相关设置时间的无等待流水车间问题的迭代算法

获取原文

摘要

In this paper, the m-machine no-wait flowshop scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times is considered to minimize the makespan. According to the problem characteristics, the increment properties of some fundamental operators of algorithms are analyzed. Two increment-based methods FSP (fittest swap points) and FMP (fittest move points) are constructed for fast evaluation on all algorithms. Four iterative algorithms on the basis of job insert, move and swap operators are proposed for the considered problem. In IMS (heuristic with insert, move and swap operators) algorithm, the current solution is constructed step by step by inserting a job at a time and is improved by conducting jobs move within a certain range. FR-IMS (full-range IMS) algorithm is a full-range IMS algorithm. Both IA (iterative algorithm) and IALS (iterative algorithm with local search) algorithms consist of two phases: solution initialization according to a certain rule and solution enhancement by iteratively conducting perturbation and move-based techniques. The main difference between IA and IALS lies in the fact that, instead of using FMP method in the enhancement phase like IA a local search process which is based on moves under a first-improvement type of pivoting rule as well as a restart mechanism is adopted in IALS. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithms outperform the best existing approaches, among which IALS is the most effective one.
机译:在本文中,考虑了具有与序列相关的设置时间的m机无等待Flowshop调度问题,以最大程度地缩短制造周期。根据问题的特点,分析了算法的一些基本算子的增量性质。构造了两种基于增量的方法FSP(适合测试的交换点)和FMP(适合测试的移动点),以便对所有算法进行快速评估。针对所考虑的问题,提出了四种基于作业插入,移动和交换运算符的迭代算法。在IMS(具有插入,移动和交换运算符的启发式算法)算法中,当前解决方案是通过一次插入一个作业逐步构建的,并通过在一定范围内进行作业移动来进行改进。 FR-IMS(全范围IMS)算法是一种全范围IMS算法。 IA(迭代算法)和IALS(具有局部搜索的迭代算法)算法均包括两个阶段:根据特定规则的解决方案初始化以及通过迭代进行扰动和基于移动的技术来增强解决方案。 IA和IALS之间的主要区别在于,不是像IA那样在增强阶段使用FMP方法,而是采用了基于第一改进类型的枢纽规则下的移动以及重新启动机制的本地搜索过程。在IALS中。实验结果表明,所提出的算法优于目前最好的算法,其中IALS是最有效的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号