首页> 外文会议>World dredging congress and exhibition >AN OVERVIEW OF FLOW REGIMES DESCRIBING SLURRY TRANSPORT
【24h】

AN OVERVIEW OF FLOW REGIMES DESCRIBING SLURRY TRANSPORT

机译:描述泥浆运输的流量系统概述

获取原文

摘要

In dredging, the hydraulic transport of solids is one of the most important processes. Since the 50's many researchers have tried to create a physical mathematical model in order to predict the head losses in slurry transport. We can think of the models of Durand, Condolios, Gibert, Worster, Zandi & Govatos, Jufin Lopatin, Fuhrboter, Newitt, Doron, Wilson, Matousek and Turian & Yuan. Some models are based on phenomenological relations and thus result in semi empirical relations, others tried to create models based on physics, like the two and three layer models. It is however the question whether slurry transport can be modeled this way at all. Observations in our laboratory show a process which is often non-stationary with respect to time and space. Different physics occur depending on the line speed, particle diameter, concentration and pipe diameter. These physics are often named flow regimes; fixed bed, shearing bed, sliding bed, heterogeneous transport and (pseudo) homogeneous transport. It is also possible that more regimes occur at the same time, like, a fixed bed in the bottom layer with heterogeneous transport in the top layer. It is the observation of the authors that researchers often focus on a detail and sub-optimize their model, which results in a model that can only be applied for the parameters used for their experiments. At high line speeds the volumetric spatial concentration (volume based) and the volumetric transport concentration (volume flux based) are almost equal, because all the particles are in suspension with a small slip related to the carrier fluid velocity. The difference of the head loss between the two concentrations will be within the margin of the scatter of the experiments. At low line speeds however, there may be a sliding or fixed bed, resulting in a big difference between the two concentrations and thus between laboratory and real life situations. This paper describes 9 flow regimes and 6 possible scenarios. The flow regimes for constant C_(vs) are; 1: fixed bed without suspension, 2: fixed bed with suspension, 3: sliding bed with suspension, 5: heterogeneous, 6: (pseudo) homogeneous, 7: homogeneous and 8: sheet flow. The flow regimes for constant C_(vt) are; 4: sliding bed with suspension, 2: fixed bed with suspension, , 5: heterogeneous, 6: (pseudo) homogeneous, 7: homogeneous and 8: sheet flow. 3 scenarios are based on a constant volumetric spatial concentration (usually in a laboratory) and 3 scenarios are based on a constant volumetric transport concentration (usually in real life). The flow regimes and scenarios are explained and examples of experiments are given. Based on the experimental evidence, one can conclude that the approach followed in this paper gives a good resemblance with the reality.
机译:在疏ed中,固体的水力输送是最重要的过程之一。从50年代开始,许多研究人员就试图创建物理数学模型来预测浆液运输中的压头损失。我们可以想到杜兰德(Durand),孔多里奥斯(Condorios),吉伯特(Girbert),沃斯特(Worster),赞迪(Zandi)和戈瓦托斯(Govatos),朱芬·洛帕汀(Jufin Lopatin),富尔波特(Fuhrboter),纽伊特(Doron),威尔逊(Wilson),马图塞克(Matousek)和图里亚恩(Turian&Yuan)的模型。一些模型基于现象学关系,因此导致了半经验关系,而其他模型则试图基于物理学创建模型,例如两层和三层模型。然而,问题是是否可以完全以这种方式对泥浆运输进行建模。我们实验室的观察结果表明,这个过程相对于时间和空间通常是不稳定的。根据线速度,粒径,浓度和管道直径,会发生不同的物理现象。这些物理常被称为流态。固定床,剪切床,滑动床,异质运输和(伪)均质运输。也可能同时发生更多的状态,例如,底层中的固定床层和顶层中的异质传输层。根据作者的观察,研究人员经常专注于细节并对其模型进行次优化,从而导致只能将模型应用于实验所用的参数。在高线速度下,体积空间浓度(基于体积)和体积运输浓度(基于体积通量)几乎相等,这是因为所有颗粒都处于悬浮状态,并且与载流流体速度有关。两种浓度之间的水头损失差异将在实验分散范围内。但是,在低线速度下,可能会有滑动床或固定床,从而导致两种浓度之间的差异很大,从而导致实验室和实际情况之间的差异很大。本文描述了9种流态和6种可能的方案。常数C_(vs)的流态为: 1:不带悬浮液的固定床; 2:带悬浮液的固定床; 3:带悬浮液的滑动床; 5:非均质的; 6 :(伪)均质的; 7:均质的; 8:片状流动的。常数C_(vt)的流态为: 4:带悬架的滑动床; 2:带悬架的固定床; 5:非均质; 6 :(伪)均质; 7:均质; 8:片流。 3个场景基于恒定的体积空间浓度(通常在实验室中),而3个场景基于恒定的体积运输浓度(通常在现实生活中)。解释了流态和情景,并给出了实验示例。根据实验证据,可以得出结论,本文采用的方法与实际情况非常相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号