首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Geoinformatics >Estimating aboveground biomass for different forest types based on Landsat TM measurements
【24h】

Estimating aboveground biomass for different forest types based on Landsat TM measurements

机译:基于Landsat TM测量的不同森林类型估算地上生物量

获取原文

摘要

Forest aboveground biomass (AGB) is an important variable for evaluating ecosystem functions, assessing fire behaviors and impacts, and understanding global carbon balance. Remote sensing technology provides a feasible way to acquire forest stand information at a reasonable cost with acceptable accuracy. This study utilized reflectance in six non-thermal Landsat TM bands and a variety of vegetation indices to identify the relationships between TM data and AGB for different forest types. The field AGB data for testing and validation was from Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) datasets of Georgia forests. The forests were classified to softwoods, hardwoods and mixed forests. The strength of correlation between AGB and TM reflectance and vegetation indices was calculated. Multiple regression analyses were used to develop AGB estimation models. The results indicated that vegetation index was better predictive variable than TM single band reflectance in AGB estimation. The vegetation indices including three or more TM bands were more strongly correlated with AGB and more commonly used in AGB estimation models. Different forest types have different relationships between TM data and AGB. The best TM bands in AGB estimation for different forest types are: TM7 and TM1 for hardwoods forests, TM1 and TM5 for softwoods forests, TM3 and TM5 for mixed forests. Potential errors in our AGB estimates could be associated with effects of soil background, the accuracy of land cover data and sampling errors. The possible way to improve the estimation accuracy can be integration of different sources of remotely sensed data or more stand structure information.
机译:地上生物量(AGB)是评估生态系统功能,评估火灾行为和影响的重要变量,并理解全球碳平衡。遥感技术提供可行的方式以合理的成本获得森林立场信息,以可接受的准确性。本研究利用六个非热覆盖TM频段和各种植被指数的反射率,以识别不同森林类型的TM数据和AGB之间的关系。用于测试和验证的现场AGB数据是来自森林库存和分析(FIA)佐治亚林的数据集。森林被归类为软木,硬木和混合林。计算了AGB和TM反射率和植被指数之间的相关性。使用多元回归分析来开发AGB估计模型。结果表明,植被指数在AGB估计中比TM单带反射率更好地预测变量。包括三个或更多个TM条带的植被指数与AGB估计模型中的AGB和更常用的植被索引更强烈地相关。不同的森林类型在TM数据和AGB之间具有不同的关系。不同森林类型的AGB估计中的最佳TM频段是:用于硬木森林,TM1和TM5的软木森林,TM3和TM5为混合林的TM1和TM5。我们的AGB估计中的潜在误差可能与土壤背景的效果,土地覆盖数据和采样误差的效果相关。提高估计精度的可能方法可以是远程感测数据或更多立场信息的不同来源的集成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号