首页> 外文会议>International Computer Science and Engineering Conference >A review and comparison of rule languages and rule-based inference engines for the Semantic Web
【24h】

A review and comparison of rule languages and rule-based inference engines for the Semantic Web

机译:语义网的规则语言和基于规则的推理引擎的回顾和比较

获取原文

摘要

With the Semantic Web data standards defined, more applications demand inference engines in providing support for intelligent processing of the Semantic Web data. Rule-based inference engines or rule-based reasoners are used in many domains such as supporting clinical decision support system, e-commerce recommender system, access control mechanism. In order to allow rule reuse and interoperation, several rule languages have been designed for the Web. In this paper, we review and compare some rule languages designed for the Web including FOL-RuleML, SWRL, Notation3, Jena rules and RIF. Some of the comparison criteria include rule expressiveness, syntax, production operations, and built-in functions. In addition, we review and compare some free and public domain rule-based reasoners including Jena inference engine, EYE, OWLIM-lite, BaseVISor and FuXi. Some of the comparison criteria include inference algorithms, supported programming languages, RDFS/OWL reasoning, rule languages and functions. The review and comparison results will provide some guideline for researchers and developers in choosing the rule languages and systems that match the application requirements.
机译:定义了语义Web数据标准后,更多应用程序需要推理引擎来提供对语义Web数据的智能处理的支持。基于规则的推理引擎或基于规则的推理程序被用于许多领域,例如支持临床决策支持系统,电子商务推荐系统,访问控制机制。为了允许规则重用和互操作,已经为Web设计了几种规则语言。在本文中,我们回顾并比较了一些为Web设计的规则语言,包括FOL-RuleML,SWRL,Notation3,Jena规则和RIF。一些比较标准包括规则表达性,语法,生产操作和内置函数。此外,我们审查并比较了一些基于自由和公共领域规则的推理机,包括耶拿推理机,EYE,OWLIM-lite,BaseVISor和FuXi。一些比较标准包括推理算法,支持的编程语言,RDFS / OWL推理,规则语言和功能。审查和比较结果将为研究人员和开发人员选择符合应用程序要求的规则语言和系统提供一些指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号