首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Information Fusion >Lessons Learned from an Evolutionary Algorithm-Based Approach to Impact Assessment Processing
【24h】

Lessons Learned from an Evolutionary Algorithm-Based Approach to Impact Assessment Processing

机译:从进化算法的基于进化算法的影响来吸取教训来影响评估处理

获取原文

摘要

The contemporary operating environment (COE) imposes significant challenges for military personnel and systems. The asymmetric nature of the threat and the proliferation of sophisticated weapon systems to rogue nations and trans-national terrorist organizations only further the need to ensure friendly forces maintain a high-level of war-fighter readiness. Additionally, the COE impacts directly on military acquisition of weapons and C4ISR systems and technologies and on the development of emerging tactics, concepts, and doctrine to meet these new challenges. As this threat evolves the importance of higher-level fusion processing and the associated development of automated fusion-based decision support systems is seen as a key enabler and facilitator for addressing the challenging requirements of the modern battle-space. Recent years has seen a focused emphasis placed on level 2 (situation assessment) and level 3 (impact assessment) data fusion processing, as defined within the Joint Directors of Laboratories (JDL) model (Steinberg, Bowman, and White). Higher levels of abstraction and inference dominate these level 2 and 3 fusion operations. Within level 2, situation abstraction is the construction of a generalized situation representation from incomplete data sets to yield a contextual interpretation of lower-level fusion products (e.g. entity track data). This level of inference is concerned with deriving knowledge from some type of pattern analysis of level 1 data. The distinction between levels 2 and 3 is that level 3 products attempt to quantify the threat's capability and predict its intent by projecting into the future, whereas level 2 results seek to indicate current hostile behavior patterns. A key component of level 3 processing is the prediction and analysis of likely enemy courses of action (eCOAs). This prediction and evaluation of enemy actions, or impact or threat assessment, is a key element of the Intelligence Preparation of the Battle-space (IPB) process. eCOA prediction and analysis is a time-consuming process requiring battle-staff personnel to manually search the space of eCOAs by generating high-level sketches (eCOA alternatives), analyzing and evaluating each alternative, and then wargaming via informal mental simulations. With the diversity of opposition facing our military forces of the future and the digitization of the battle-space, experienced staff may not exist. eCOAs developed for a particular enemy by a particular commander and staff over a period of time may be over idiosyncratic or stereotyped. Mission success depends on the ability to leverage what information is available about the enemy forces and capabilities, both from experts and from military intelligence sources, and use that to predict the likely enemy COAs for the current, or anticipated, military situation.
机译:当代运行环境(COE)规定了军事人员和系统显著的挑战。威胁的不对称性和复杂武器系统的无赖国家和跨国恐怖组织的扩散只会进一步需要确保友军保持战争战斗机准备的高水平。此外,直接在军事武器装备和C4ISR系统和技术以及新兴的战术,概念和理论的发展COE影响,以满足这些新的挑战。由于这种威胁的发展更高层次的融合处理的重要性,并自动以Fusion为基础的决策支持系统的相关发展被视为一个关键推动者和促进解决现代战场空间的挑战要求。近年来,已经出现了集中的重点放在2级(态势评估)和3级(影响评价)数据融合处理,如实验室(JDL)模型的联合董事(斯坦伯格,鲍曼和白色)中定义。更高层次的抽象和推理支配这些级别2和3的融合业务。内2级,情况抽象是广义情况表示的不完全的数据集的结构,得到的较低级别的融合产物的上下文解释(例如实体轨道数据)。推论的这个级别涉及一些类型的1级数据的模式分析的推导知识。等级2和3之间的区别是3级的产品尝试量化威胁的能力,并通过投影到未来预测其意图,而2级成绩努力指出目前的敌对行为模式。水平3的处理的一个关键组成部分是动作的可能敌人课程(eCOAs)预测和分析。这一预测与敌人的行动,或影响或威胁评估的评价,是战役空间(IPB)过程的情报准备的关键要素。 ECOA预测和分析是一个耗时的过程,需要战斗人员人员通过生成高水平的草图(ECOA替代),分析和评估每个替代,然后通过非正式的精神模拟战争游戏手动搜索eCOAs的空间。反对派面临的未来和战斗空间的数字化部队的多样性,经验丰富的员工可能不存在。 eCOAs特定敌人开发了特定的指挥官和工作人员在一段时间可能是在特质或刻板。使命的成功取决于有能力利用哪些信息可用的敌方部队和能力,无论是从专家和军事情报的来源,并用它来预测可能的敌人COA的当前或预期,军事形势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号