首页> 外文会议>International Conference on ITS Telecommunications >Comparison for VANETs: Conventional routing vs an advanced opportunistic routing scheme using active signaling
【24h】

Comparison for VANETs: Conventional routing vs an advanced opportunistic routing scheme using active signaling

机译:VANET的比较:传统路由与使用主动信令的高级机会路由方案

获取原文

摘要

In opportunistic routing the next relay is selected at each hop of each packet depending on the local pattern of simultaneous transmitters. The protocol considered in this paper assumes that at each hop, the optimal relay is chosen in a greedy way such that the packet receiver minimizes the remaining distance to the destination. The selection between potential relays is done using a logarithmic scale. This is a more efficient solution than the usually proposed solutions that use a linear scale.We evaluate the benefits of this protocol in the context of the point-to-point traffic in Vehicular Ad hoc NETworks (VANETs). We conduct this evaluation using extensive simulations with two widely used medium access techniques: slotted Aloha and CSMA.We show that even in one-dimensional scenarios, this protocol significantly outperforms conventional shortest path routing, offering shorter mean end-to-end packet delivery delay and smaller channel utilization.
机译:在机会主义路由中,根据同时发射器的本地模式,在每个数据包的每跳时选择下一个继电器。本文考虑的协议假设在每跳时,以贪婪的方式选择最佳继电器,使得分组接收器最小化到目的地的剩余距离。潜在继电器之间的选择是使用对数刻度完成的。这是一个比使用线性刻度的通常提出的解决方案更有效的解决方案。我们在车辆临时网络(VANET)中的点对点流量的上下文中评估本协议的优势。我们使用具有两种广泛使用的中途访问技术的广泛仿真进行此评估:开槽Aloha和CSMA.WE表明即使在一维情景中,该协议即使在一维场景中,该协议也显着优于传统的最短路径路由,提供较短的平均端到端分组输送延迟和较小的渠道利用率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号