首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation >An Empirical Study of the Relationship of Stability Metrics and the QMOOD Quality Models Over Software Developed Using Highly Iterative or Agile Software Processes
【24h】

An Empirical Study of the Relationship of Stability Metrics and the QMOOD Quality Models Over Software Developed Using Highly Iterative or Agile Software Processes

机译:使用高度迭代或敏捷软件流程实现稳定度量与QMood优质模型的实证研究

获取原文

摘要

The purpose of our study is to analyze whether the Bansiya and Davis quality models also reflect the ongoing stability of a software design in software developed using a highly iterative or agile process. We performed an empirical study over multiple iterations of various software packages developed using highly iterative or agile methods. We examined several Bansiya and Davis quality factor models (reusability, flexibility, understandability, functionality, extendibility, and effectiveness) over this data set and we compared them to stability metrics. We conclude that the Bansiya and Davis total quality index does indeed reflect stability over the data sets examined.
机译:我们的研究目的是分析班尼亚和戴维斯质量模型是否还反映了使用高度迭代或敏捷过程开发的软件中软件设计的持续稳定性。我们对使用高度迭代或敏捷方法开发的各种软件包的多次迭代进行了实证研究。我们在此数据集中审查了几个班义亚和戴维斯质量因素模型(可重用性,灵活性,可易于理解,功能,效力,功能,功能,功能,功能,可扩展性和有效性,并且我们将它们与稳定度量进行比较。我们得出结论,班塞亚和戴维斯总质量指数确实反映了所检查数据集的稳定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号