首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering >Demand response: Social welfare maximisation in an unbundled energy market - case study for the low-voltage networks of a distribution network operator in the Netherlands
【24h】

Demand response: Social welfare maximisation in an unbundled energy market - case study for the low-voltage networks of a distribution network operator in the Netherlands

机译:需求响应:在一个不捆绑的能源市场中的社会福利最大化 - 荷兰分销网络运营商低压网络的案例研究

获取原文

摘要

With the introduction of smart meters, dynamic pricing and home energy management systems, residential customers are able to react to changes in electricity prices. In an unbundled market, the energy supplier and the network operator may have conflicting interests with respect to demand response (DR) programs. As the customer participation is essential to a well-functioning DR program, it is needed to assess which DR programs offers the most benefits to customers. Two DR program options are analysed for low-voltage feeders: a program from the energy supplier based on the electricity price, and a demand response program from the network operator based on the loading of the network. Depending on the grid topology the benefits can change significantly between the two DR programs. DR from an energy supplier point of view might induce under-voltages which lead to grid reinforcements, while load shifting from a network point of view can generate higher electricity cost.
机译:随着智能电表的引入,动态定价和家庭能源管理系统,住宅客户能够对电力价格的变化作出反应。在一个不捆绑的市场中,能源供应商和网络运营商可能对需求响应(DR)计划的利益相互矛盾。由于客户参与对一个充分发挥良好的DR计划至关重要,因此需要评估哪些计划为客户提供最大的好处。分析了两种DR程序选项,用于低压馈线:基于电价的能源供应商的程序,以及网络运营商的需求响应计划,基于网络的负载。根据网格拓扑,益处可以在两个DR程序之间显着变化。来自能源供应商的博士可能会引起电压的低压,导致栅极增强,而从网络的载荷移位可以产生更高的电力成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号