首页> 外文会议>International pipeline conference >J-RESISTANCE RESULTS FROM MULTI-SPECIMEN AND SINGLE-SPECIMEN SURFACE NOTCHED SEN(T) GEOMETRY
【24h】

J-RESISTANCE RESULTS FROM MULTI-SPECIMEN AND SINGLE-SPECIMEN SURFACE NOTCHED SEN(T) GEOMETRY

机译:多样本和单样本表面缺口SEN(T)几何的J电阻结果

获取原文

摘要

In a collaborative program, J-R results were compared from multi-specimen and single-specimen procedures for toughness testing with single-edge notched tensile loaded SEN(T) specimens. Grade 483 MPa (X70) grade pipeline steel was used to prepare surface notched axially loaded specimens. Test procedures followed the multi-specimen method and a single-specimen recommended practice recently developed at the CANMET Materials Technology Laboratory (recently name-changed to CanmetMATERIALS) in a program jointly funded by PERD, PRCI, and DOT. The multi-specimen method adopted side grooves with the objective of comparison with results from the single-specimen method. The specimen geometry was B x B for both test procedures. The target a_o/W was about 0.5. The multi-specimen testing was performed at BMT Fleet Technology. The single-specimen testing was performed at the CANMET laboratory, formerly located in Ottawa. The paper describes experimental and analysis details, and compares results from the two techniques, using J expressions developed at CANMET. The results showed similar J-resistance curves at small crack extensions for both techniques, and higher J-resistance values at larger crack extensions for the multi-specimen method. The results are discussed in terms of initial crack length and the analysis methods adopted for the two techniques. Validity criteria according to ASTM El820 were applied and the results are presented.
机译:在一个协作程序中,比较了多样本和单样本程序的J-R结果,以对单边缘带槽口的拉伸载荷SEN(T)样本进行韧性测试。使用483 MPa(X70)级的管线钢来制备表面开槽的轴向受压试样。测试程序遵循多样本方法和CANMET材料技术实验室最近开发的单样本推荐做法(最近更名为CanmetMATERIALS),该计划由PERD,PRCI和DOT共同资助。多样本方法采用侧槽,目的是与单样本方法的结果进行比较。两种测试程序的样品几何尺寸均为B xB。目标a_o / W约为0.5。多样本测试是在BMT Fleet Technology进行的。单样本测试是在以前位于渥太华的CANMET实验室进行的。本文介绍了实验和分析的详细信息,并使用CANMET开发的J表达式比较了两种技术的结果。结果表明,对于这两种技术,在较小裂纹扩展处的J电阻曲线相似,对于多样本方法,在较大裂纹扩展处的J电阻值较高。根据初始裂纹长度和两种技术所采用的分析方法对结果进行了讨论。应用根据ASTM El820的有效性标准,并给出结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号