首页> 外文会议>International conference on Computational Methods and Experiments in Materials Characterisation >Characterisation of the mechanical behaviour of a polyurethane elastomer based on indentation and tensile creep experiments
【24h】

Characterisation of the mechanical behaviour of a polyurethane elastomer based on indentation and tensile creep experiments

机译:基于压痕和拉伸蠕变实验的聚氨酯弹性体力学性能表征

获取原文

摘要

This research focuses on the determination of the mechanical properties of a viscoelastic polyurethane material with 2 different measuring techniques on 2 different length scales. Instrumented Indentation Testing (IIT) was used to test the material on a micro scale while tensile creep experiments characterised the macro scale material behaviour. All experimental data were processed by means of a fitting procedure based on the standard linear solid material model. The experiments were performed with different loading rates and hold values. The developed fitting procedure proved to be applicable to analyse the experimental data on both length scales. FEM was used to coordinate the applied strains of both measuring techniques. A comparison between the results originating from the experiments with both techniques indicated a stiffer material response on the micro scale (up to 4x). The more complex strain field inside the material during indentation compared to the uniform tensile loading on macro scale is responsible for this large discrepancy. For this reason comparing the results of IIT with tensile creep results should be done with great care.
机译:这项研究的重点是在2种不同的长度范围内使用2种不同的测量技术确定粘弹性聚氨酯材料的机械性能。仪器压痕测试(IIT)用于在微观尺度上测试材料,而拉伸蠕变实验则对宏观尺度的材料行为进行了表征。通过基于标准线性固体材料模型的拟合程序处理所有实验数据。实验以不同的加载速率和保持值进行。事实证明,所开发的拟合程序适用于在两个长度范围内分析实验数据。 FEM用于协调两种测量技术的施加应变。两种技术的实验结果之间的比较表明,微观尺度上的材料响应较硬(最高4倍)。与宏观尺度上均匀的拉伸载荷相比,压痕过程中材料内部更复杂的应变场是造成这种较大差异的原因。因此,应格外小心地将IIT结果与拉伸蠕变结果进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号