首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security >Social Issues of Big Data and Cloud: Privacy, Confidentiality, and Public Utility
【24h】

Social Issues of Big Data and Cloud: Privacy, Confidentiality, and Public Utility

机译:大数据和云的社会问题:隐私,保密性和公共事业

获取原文

摘要

Business people and academia are now excited about Big Data and Cloud Computing as the new and most innovative means for enhancing productivity and customer satisfaction. Simultaneously, there are strong concerns about privacy not only among privacy advocates but among consumers in general, and how to strike a right balance is the main theme in every field of science. However, it is quite strange that very little attention has been paid to the concept of confidentiality, which must be the core element of privacy. This paper first tries to analyze the following two dichotomies as a basis for possible policy considerations: (1) privacy approach in the United States versus confidentiality approach in the United Kingdom, though they share the same common law tradition, and (2) clear demarcation between Information Service and Telecommunications in the United States, dating back to the Computer Inquiry in the 1970s. This paper also analyzes the features of the Cloud and discusses the possibility of treating it as a new type of Public Utility, namely Information Utility. This hypothesis should be rejected, because there are crucial differences in market structures, regardless of clear similarities in service features. Instead, this paper emphasizes the necessity of protecting confidentiality as an industrial norm. Taking into account the long tradition of free market for computing industries, self-regulation is basically preferable to government regulation. But from a different viewpoint of "nudge", a hybrid combination of libertarianism and paternalism, this paper concludes by proposing five short recommendations including fair contract terms as well as unbundling confidentiality from privacy.
机译:现在,商务人士和学术界对大数据和云计算感到兴奋,因为大数据和云计算是提高生产力和客户满意度的最新,最具创新性的手段。同时,不仅在隐私倡导者中,而且在一般消费者中,人们都非常关注隐私问题,而如何实现适当的平衡是每个科学领域的主要主题。但是,很奇怪的是,人们很少关注保密性的概念,因为保密性必须是隐私的核心要素。本文首先尝试分析以下两个二分法,作为可能的政策考虑依据:(1)美国的隐私权与英国的保密权,尽管它们具有相同的习惯法传统,并且(2)明确划分可以追溯到1970年代的计算机查询。本文还分析了云的功能,并讨论了将其视为一种新型的公共实用程序,即信息实用程序的可能性。该假设应被拒绝,因为无论服务功能的明显相似之处,市场结构都存在重大差异。取而代之的是,本文强调了保护机密性作为工业规范的必要性。考虑到计算机行业自由市场的悠久传统,自我监管基本上比政府监管更为可取。但是,从“轻推”的不同角度来看,这是自由主义和家长式的混合体,本文最后提出了五个简短的建议,包括公平的合同条款以及从隐私中分离保密性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号