首页> 外文会议>International conference on remediation of contaminated sediments >Characterization of Sediment at the Gorge Dam, Cuyahoga River Area of Concern, Akron, OH
【24h】

Characterization of Sediment at the Gorge Dam, Cuyahoga River Area of Concern, Akron, OH

机译:俄亥俄州阿克伦市关注的库雅荷加河地区峡谷大坝的沉积物特征

获取原文

摘要

Background/Objectives. The Gorge Dam, located on the Cuyahoga River between Akronand Cuyahoga Falls, OH, was identified in the Ohio 2008 Integrated Water QualityMonitoring and Assessment Report as a significant contributor to non-attainment of theState’s water quality standards due to habitat alteration and hydraulic modification (OhioEPA, 2008). GLNPO is working with the Ohio EPA to provide information that is criticalin the evaluation of the removal of the dam. Under the Great Lakes Legacy Act program,GLNPO completed a two-phase site characterization to determine the nature and extentof chemical contamination in the sediments upstream of the Gorge Dam with supportfrom Battelle. The objective of Phase 1, which was conducted in September 2009, was tocollect sufficient sediment physical and chemical data to estimate the prevalence ofchemicals of interest (COI) and the spatial variability of concentrations in those COI atthe site. The Phase 2 objectives which were to finalize the characterization of the natureand extent of COI and determine sediment thickness within the Cuyahoga River GorgeDam project area.Approach. Spatial correlation information obtained from historical data and Phase 1 resultswere used to develop a comprehensive but efficient sampling design. A blockkriging analysis was performed based on semivariogram models derived to determine theamount of sampling required to sufficiently characterize the spatial distribution of contaminantsin the investigative area. The combined Phase 1 and Phase 2 sampling strategyresulted in 50 discrete sample stations - 28 locations in Phase 1 and 22 locations inPhase 2. At each location, full-length (to refusal) sediment cores were attempted with vibracoreor push core methods. Refusal was not achieved at some locations due to variouscauses. A statistical approach was also utilized to determine the number of poling locations(N=181) needed to accurately (95% CI) determine sediment thickness, which wasthen used to calculate the total sediment volume within the targeted stretch of the CuyahogaRiver.Results. All COI were screened for potential adverse environmental effects using consensus-based probable effect concentration levels (PEC; MacDonald et al., 2000). Threecontaminants: cadmium, lead, and total PAHs, exceeded their PEC levels in >50% of thesamples. Interestingly, there were no notable hot spots either horizontally or verticallywithin study area sediments. However, statistical data summaries determined that, in general,contaminant concentrations were lower in the bend of the river by the Front StreetBridge and were demonstrated using three dimensional graphic displays. Site data indi
机译:背景/目标。峡谷大坝,位于阿克伦山脉之间的凯霍加河上 俄亥俄州的Cuyahoga Falls被确定为“俄亥俄州2008年综合水质” 监测和评估报告是未达到目标的重要原因 由于栖息地的改变和水力改良而导致的州水质标准(俄亥俄州 EPA,2008年)。 GLNPO正在与俄亥俄州EPA合作,以提供至关重要的信息 在评估拆除大坝的过程中。根据《大湖区遗产法案》计划, GLNPO完成了两阶段的站点表征,以确定性质和范围 支撑下峡谷大坝上游沉积物中的化学污染 来自Battelle。第一阶段的目标是在2009年9月进行,目的是 收集足够的沉积物理化数据以估算 感兴趣的化学品(COI)以及这些COI在 网站。第二阶段的目标是最终确定自然的特征 COI的大小和范围,并确定Cuyahoga河峡谷内的沉积物厚度 大坝工程区。 方法。从历史数据和第一阶段结果获得的空间相关信息 被用来开发一个全面而有效的抽样设计。一个街区 根据得出的半变异函数模型进行克里格分析,以确定 充分表征污染物的空间分布所需的采样数量 在调查领域。第1阶段和第2阶段相结合的抽样策略 产生了50个离散的采样站-第一阶段有28个位置,第二阶段有22个位置 阶段2。在每个位置,尝试使用vibracore全长(拒绝)沉积物岩心 或推核心方法。由于各种原因,在某些地方未实现拒绝 原因。还使用统计方法来确定极化位置的数量 (N = 181)才能准确地(95%CI)确定沉积物厚度,这是 然后用于计算Cuhohoga目标区域内的总沉积物量 河。 结果。使用共识-筛选了所有COI潜在的不利环境影响- 基于可能的效应浓度水平(PEC; MacDonald等,2000)。三 污染物:镉,铅和总多环芳烃含量超过其PEC含量的50%以上 样品。有趣的是,水平或垂直方向都没有明显的热点 在研究区域内的沉积物。但是,统计数据摘要确定,总体而言, 前街沿河的弯道中污染物浓度较低 桥和使用三维图形显示进行了演示。网站数据索引

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号