首页> 外文会议>Transportation Research Board Annual meeting >REVISITING DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS FOR CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS FROM CAR TRAVEL: INTRODUCTION OF MODIFIED LASPEYRES INDEX METHOD
【24h】

REVISITING DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS FOR CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS FROM CAR TRAVEL: INTRODUCTION OF MODIFIED LASPEYRES INDEX METHOD

机译:机动车行驶中二氧化碳排放量的再分解分析:改进的沥青指数法介绍

获取原文

摘要

Decomposition analyses are helpful to policymakers and analysts who aim to reduce carbondioxide (CO_2) emissions from car travel. A large number of decomposition methods have beenproposed till date. However, there is still no consensus regarding the best decompositionmethod because each method has certain advantages and disadvantages. Which method isvalid for the decomposition of the changes in CO_2 emissions from car travel? In this paper, werevisit the Refined Laspeyres Index (RLI) method, Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index I (LMDI)method, and Modified Laspeyres Index (MLI) method. After a discussion of theoretical issues,we focus on period-wise, time-series, and cross-region decompositions of the changes in CO_2emissions from passenger cars in Japan, using the three methods. While the RLI and LMDImethods are the most widely used by researchers and analysts, these methods containtheoretical problems with the attribution and distribution of interaction terms, particularlywhen some factors change positively and others change negatively. The recently proposedMLI method helps in resolving these issues by attributing and distributing the interactionterms to related factors according to the changes in each factor. Our case studies in Japan alsoindicate that differences in the attribution of the interaction term to the related factors betweenthe three methods influence the decomposition results significantly. We conclude that the MLImethod generates more valid decomposition results than do the RLI and LMDI methodsbecause of the reasonable attribution and distribution of the interaction terms.
机译:分解分析对旨在减少碳排放的决策者和分析人员很有帮助 汽车旅行产生的二氧化碳(CO_2)排放。已经有大量的分解方法 建议截止日期。但是,关于最佳分解,仍未达成共识 方法,因为每种方法都有一定的优点和缺点。哪种方法 对分解汽车旅行产生的CO_2排放变化有效吗?在本文中,我们 重新审视精制Laspeyres指数(RLI)方法,对数平均除数指数I(LMDI) 方法和修正的Laspeyres指数(MLI)方法。在讨论了理论问题之后, 我们专注于CO_2变化的按时间,时间序列和跨区域分解 日本使用三种方法排放的乘用车。而RLI和LMDI 方法是研究人员和分析人员使用最广泛的方法,这些方法包含 交互项的属性和分布的理论问题,特别是 当某些因素发生积极变化而另一些因素发生消极变化时。最近提出 MLI方法通过归因和分布交互来帮助解决这些问题 根据每个因素的变化对相关因素进行分析。我们在日本的案例研究 表明交互作用项对相关因素之间的归属之间的差异 这三种方法对分解结果有显着影响。我们得出结论,MLI 与RLI和LMDI方法相比,该方法生成的分解结果更有效 因为互动条款的合理归因和分布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号