首页> 外文会议>Americas conference on information systems >An Examination of the Strategic Alignment Literature in IS through a Co-Citation Analysis
【24h】

An Examination of the Strategic Alignment Literature in IS through a Co-Citation Analysis

机译:通过共引分析法检查IS中的战略联盟文献

获取原文

摘要

In this article we study the diffusion of Henderson and Venkatraman's strategic alignment model (SAM) through the analysis of their 1993 seminal article's legacy. We investigate all works that cite this article and show that this corpus constitutes a homogeneous research field that does not question the basic assumptions of the original model. We investigate the intellectual structure of this field. Using different techniques of data analysis such as author co-citation analysis, multidimensional scaling and factor analysis, we confirm the existence of this field of research and delineate different theoretical pillars, i.e. the hypotheses and premises of this field. Despite a first movement of dissociation between SAM and its theoretical origins, the intellectual structure of the field reinforces the original hypotheses and premises. This field mostly does not challenge SAM's fundamental assumptions although these assumptions may artificially constrain organizational reality and take into account a very limited aspect of it. We conclude by an appeal to reconsider SAM through other possible alternative perspectives and assumptions. This might well lead to an improvement of IT projects' success rate in organizations.
机译:在本文中,我们通过分析其1993年开创性文章的遗产,研究了亨德森和文卡特拉曼的战略联盟模型(SAM)的传播。我们调查了引用本文的所有作品,并表明该语料库构成了一个同类研究领域,对原始模型的基本假设没有质疑。我们研究了该领域的知识结构。我们使用不同的数据分析技术(例如作者同被引分析,多维尺度分析和因子分析)来确认该研究领域的存在,并描绘出不同的理论基础,即该领域的假设和前提。尽管SAM和它的理论起源之间发生了分离的第一个运动,但该领域的知识结构加强了最初的假设和前提。尽管这些假设可能会人为地限制组织现实并考虑到它的非常有限的方面,但该领域通常不会挑战SAM的基本假设。最后,我们呼吁通过其他可能的替代观点和假设重新考虑SAM。这很可能会提高组织中IT项目的成功率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号