首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the International Speech Communication Association >Objective, Subjective and Linguistic Roads to Perceptual Prominence How are they compared and why?
【24h】

Objective, Subjective and Linguistic Roads to Perceptual Prominence How are they compared and why?

机译:客观,主观和语言通往知觉的道路如何比较它们,为什么?

获取原文

摘要

Prosodic prominence denotes the perceptual salience of linguistic units. There exists no agreement on (1) adequate methods for its subjective measurement, (2) its objective acoustic correlates and (3) its relationship to linguistic structure. A traditional approach for evaluating any of these descriptive layers is an inter-level comparison, e.g. between a perceptual and an acoustic model of prominence. However, (1) there exists no standard procedure for such a comparison, and (2) such a comparison is misleading if both layers are expected to be symmetrical, given the neglected influence of linguistic top-down expectancies. We propose an evaluation procedure for prominence models relying on tripartite correlations of perception, its acoustic correlates and linguistic expectations. We suggest a novel correlation metric and test its usefulness on a prosodic corpus of German.
机译:韵律突出是指语言单元的感知显着性。关于(1)主观测量的适当方法,(2)它的客观声学关联和(3)它与语言结构的关系尚无共识。评估这些描述层中任一层的传统方法是层间比较,例如在感知的和声学的突出模型之间。但是,(1)没有标准的比较方法,(2)如果考虑到语言自上而下的期望受到忽略的影响,如果期望两层都是对称的,那么这种比较就会产生误导。我们提出了基于感知的三方相关性,其声学相关性和语言期望的突出模型的评估程序。我们建议一种新颖的相关度量,并在德语的韵律语料库中测试其有用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号