首页> 外文会议>International conference on cold regions engineering >Review of Standards for Ice Forces on Port Structures
【24h】

Review of Standards for Ice Forces on Port Structures

机译:审查港口结构的冰力标准

获取原文

摘要

Port structures in cold regions generally take the form of large caisson structures or piled structures. There are limited standards for such structures, so the following standards for highway bridges and offshore structures were assessed for application in specifying ice forces on port structures; CSA-S6 Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, ISO 19906 Arctic offshore structures, CSA-S471 General requirements, design criteria, the environment, and loads, API Recommended Practice 2N Planning, Designing, and Constructing Structures and Pipelines for Arctic Conditions (1995), and Russia's SNiP 2.06.04-82* Loads and Effects on Hydrotechnical Structures. The ice condition considered was level ice 0.2 to 2 m thick. Three typical structures were evaluated; 1 m diameter pile, 4 m diameter structure and a 50 m wide structure. CSA S6 was found to be best suited for small pile structures (~1 m dia.). For slightly larger structures (~4 m dia.), CSA S6 was the best choice, but ISO 19906 and CSA S471 could be used for ice thickness greater than 1.2 m. Finally, for wide structures CSA S471 was most suitable, but ISO 19906 or API RP 2N could be used for ice thickness greater than 0.6 m and up to 2 m.
机译:寒冷地区的端口结构通常采用大型沉箱结构或堆积结构的形式。这些结构的标准有限,因此评估了以下公路桥梁和海上结构的标准,以便在港口结构上指定冰力; CSA-S6加拿大公路桥梁设计代码,ISO 19906北极海上结构,CSA-S471一般要求,设计标准,环境和负载,API推荐练习2N规划,设计,构建北极状况的结构和管道(1995),和俄罗斯的Snip 2.06.04-82 *负载和对水技术结构的影响。被认为是水平冰的冰条件0.2至2米厚。评估了三种典型的结构; 1米直径桩,直径4米,结构50米。发现CSA S6最适合小桩结构(〜1米。)。对于略大的结构(〜4M Dia。),CSA S6是最佳选择,但ISO 19906和CSA S471可用于大于1.2米的冰厚度。最后,对于宽结构,CSA S471最合适,但ISO 19906或API RP 2N可用于冰厚度大于0.6μm,最多2米。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号