【24h】

SAFETY - QUO VADIS

机译:安全-Quo Vadis

获取原文

摘要

Due to the quantum leaps in occupant protection, (1) the improvements and the use of seat belts, (2) the introduction of head and thorax protecting airbags in frontal and lateral collisions, (3) the implementation of real world frontal and lateral crashes, the number of fatalities could be reduced significantly in the developed countries over the last decades. Nevertheless, worldwide approx. 3500 people die in traffic accidents every day, and the number of accidents is increasing. In order to reverse this negative trend, the focus of automotive safety must be enhanced from occupant protection (passive safety) to accident avoidance (active safety). A major step is already underway with the implementation of the Electronic Stability Control, the 2nd most effective safety system after seat belts. Similar benefits are anticipated through Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) which address driver errors responsible for 90 % of all accidents: By warning the driver in critical situations before intervening, they accommodate the 1968 Vienna Convention on Road Traffic ("the driver must control the vehicle at all times and in all circumstances"), however they cannot fully utilize the potential of predictive-preventive systems:(1) Convenience features may not be always 100 % fail-safe, which the driver may not be aware of. (2) If "assistants" always pay attention to hazards, warning the driver or even semi-autonomously maneuver the vehicle, the driver's attention may decrease.(3) In order to avoid false positives, warnings are issued approximately 2.5 seconds before time to collision (TTC). This may be too early for attentive drivers (nuisance), but too late for drivers with a longer reaction time (warning dilemma).(4) Since interventions typically occur only one second before TTC, valuable time has been lost if the driver does not, or (too) late, or even inappropriately react to a warning, and in many cases, a collision cannot be avoided any more.As a result, the ADAS co-pilots must be enhanced to temporary auto-pilots: The HAZARD-pilot will take control over the vehicle in challenging maneuvers even before a critical situation may develop: prevention instead of warning. The AUTO-PILOT will be initiated by the driver in specific scenarios when piloting a car is boring or painful, i.e. in traffic jams. In order to enable such Temporary Autonomous Driving (TAD), all ADAS functions must accommodate the Automotive Safety Integrity Levels (ASIL) derived from the ISO 26262 standard. This will require numerous predictive sensors around the vehicle (sensor fusion), intelligent software to evaluate the sensor data, along with powerful computers to process the highly sophisticated algorithms.
机译:由于乘员保护方面的巨大飞跃,(1)安全带的改进和使用;(2)在正面和侧面碰撞中引入了头部和胸部保护安全气囊;(3)现实世界中正面和侧面碰撞的实现在过去的几十年中,发达国家的死亡人数可以大大减少。尽管如此,全球范围内。每天有3500人死于交通事故,并且事故数量还在增加。为了扭转这种消极趋势,必须将汽车安全的重点从乘员保护(被动安全)提高到避免事故(主动安全)。电子稳定控制系统的实施已经迈出了重要的一步,电子稳定控制系统是仅次于安全带的第二个最有效的安全系统。先进的驾驶员辅助系统(ADAS)有望解决类似的问题,该系统解决了90%的事故都是由驾驶员造成的:通过在危急情况下警告驾驶员,然后进行干预,它们可以适应1968年的《维也纳道路交通公约》(“驾驶员必须控制车辆,无论何时何地都可以使用”),但是他们无法充分利用预防性预测系统的潜力:(1)便利性可能并不总是100%故障安全,驾驶员可能并不知道。 (2)如果“助手”始终注意危险,警告驾驶员甚至半自动操纵车辆,驾驶员的注意力可能会减少。(3)为避免误报,警告信号会在行驶前约2.5秒发出。碰撞(TTC)。对于细心的驾驶员而言,这可能为时过早(烦扰),但对于反应时间较长的驾驶员而言,这为时已晚(警告困境)。(4)由于干预通常仅在TTC之前一秒钟发生,因此如果驾驶员没有采取干预措施,则会浪费宝贵的时间。 ,(或)太晚,甚至对警告做出不适当的反应,在许多情况下,再也无法避免发生碰撞。因此,必须将ADAS副驾驶员增强为临时自动驾驶员:HAZARD驾驶员即使在出现紧急情况之前,也将在挑战性的操纵中控制车辆:预防而不是警告。驾驶员在无聊或痛苦的情况下(即交通拥堵)在特定情况下将由驾驶员启动自动驾驶仪。为了启用这种临时自动驾驶(TAD),所有ADAS功能都必须符合ISO 26262标准衍生的汽车安全完整性等级(ASIL)。这将需要车辆周围的许多预测传感器(传感器融合),用于评估传感器数据的智能软件以及功能强大的计算机来处理高度复杂的算法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号