【24h】

A New Framework for Analyzing Structural Volume Changes of Longitudinal Brain MRI Data

机译:分析纵向脑MRI数据的结构体积变化的新框架

获取原文

摘要

Cross-sectional analysis of longitudinal MRI data might be sub-optimal as each dataset is analyzed independently. In this study, we evaluate how much variability can be reduced by analyzing structural volume changes of longitudinal data using longitudinal analysis. We propose a two-part pipeline that consists of longitudinal registration and longitudinal classification. The longitudinal registration step includes the creation of subject-specific linear and non-linear templates that are then registered to a population template. The longitudinal classification is composed of a 4D EM algorithm, using a priori classes computed by averaging the tissue classes of all time points obtained cross-sectionally. To study the impact of these two steps, we apply the framework completely (called LL method: Longitudinal registration and Longitudinal classification) and partially (LC method: Longitudinal registration and Cross-sectional classification) and compare these to a standard cross-sectional framework (CC method: Cross-sectional registration and Cross-sectional classification). The three methods are applied to (1) a scan-rescan database to analyze the reliability and to (2) the NIH pediatric population to compare the GM and WM growth trajectories, evaluated with a linear mixed-model. The LL method, and the LC method to a lesser extent, significantly reduce the variability in the measurements in the scan-rescan study and give the best fitted GM and WM growth models with the NIH pediatric database. The results confirm that both steps of the longitudinal framework reduce the variability and improve the accuracy compared to the cross-sectional framework, with longitudinal classification yielding the greatest impact.
机译:纵向MRI数据的横截面分析可能不够理想,因为每个数据集都是独立分析的。在这项研究中,我们评估通过使用纵向分析来分析纵向数据的结构体积变化,可以减少多少可变性。我们提出了一个由纵向注册和纵向分类组成的两部分管道。纵向注册步骤包括创建特定于受试者的线性和非线性模板,然后将其注册到总体模板。纵向分类由4D EM算法组成,它使用通过对横截面获得的所有时间点的组织类别求平均而计算出的先验类别。为了研究这两个步骤的影响,我们完全应用了该框架(称为LL方法:纵向配准和纵向分类),部分应用了该框架(LC方法:纵向配准和横截面分类),并将其与标准横截面框架进行比较( CC方法:横断面配准和横断面分类)。将这三种方法应用于(1)扫描-再扫描数据库以分析可靠性,以及(2)将NIH儿科人群用于比较GM和WM生长轨迹,并用线性混合模型进行评估。 LL方法和LC方法在较小程度上显着降低了扫描-再扫描研究中测量的可变性,并提供了与NIH儿科数据库最匹配的GM和WM生长模型。结果证实,与横截面框架相比,纵向框架的两个步骤都减少了变异性并提高了准确性,而纵向分类产生的影响最大。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号