首页> 外文会议>Corrosion conference and expo;Corrosion 2012 >Would the Real -850 mVcsE Criterion Please Stand Up
【24h】

Would the Real -850 mVcsE Criterion Please Stand Up

机译:真实的-850 mVcsE标准能否站起来

获取原文

摘要

Some recent papers contain inaccurate information regarding the validity of the -850 mV_(CSE) current applied criterion, the so-called on-potential criterion. To qualify as a corrosion control criterion the -850mV_(CSE) value must imply a sound engineering judgment of the corrosion rate. Only the -850 mV_(CSE) polarized potential criterion does this, as supported theoretically and empirically through its development, where a corrosion rate of less than 1mpy (< 0.025mm/a) is generally accepted. There is no similar scientific backing for the -850 mV_(CSE) on-potential criterion. Numerous comparative studies of these two criteria illustrate that the corrosion rate can not be judged on the basis of an on-potential criterion when the IR drop is ignored. Failure to correct the on-potential measurement, by removing the IR drop, leaves the public exposed to an unnecessary safety risk.
机译:最近的一些论文包含有关-850 mV_(CSE)当前应用标准(即所谓的接通电势标准)的有效性的不准确信息。为了符合腐蚀控制标准,-850mV_(CSE)值必须暗示对腐蚀速率的合理工程判断。在理论上和经验上都支持-850 mV_(CSE)极化电位准则,因此其腐蚀速率低于1mpy(<0.025mm / a)通常是可接受的。 -850 mV_(CSE)的电势准则没有类似的科学依据。对这两个标准的大量比较研究表明,当忽略IR下降时,不能根据准电位标准来判断腐蚀速率。通过消除红外压降无法校正电势测量值,会使公众面临不必要的安全风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号