首页> 外文会议>International conference on business process management;BPM 2011 >Imperative versus Declarative Process Modeling Languages: An Empirical Investigation
【24h】

Imperative versus Declarative Process Modeling Languages: An Empirical Investigation

机译:命令式与声明式流程建模语言:实证研究

获取原文

摘要

Streams of research are emerging that emphasize the advantages of using declarative process modeling languages over more traditional, imperative approaches. In particular, the declarative modeling approach is known for its ability to cope with the limited flexibility of the imperative approach. However, there is still not much empirical insight into the actual strengths and the applicability of each modeling paradigm. In this paper, we investigate in an experimental setting if either the imperative or the declarative process modeling approach is superior with respect to process model understanding. Even when task types are considered that should better match one or the other, our study finds that imperative process modeling languages appear to be connected with better understanding.
机译:涌现出越来越多的研究流,它们强调了使用声明性过程建模语言相对于更传统的命令式方法的优势。特别地,声明性建模方法以其应对命令性方法的有限灵活性的能力而闻名。但是,对于每种建模范例的实际优势和适用性仍然没有太多的经验性见识。在本文中,我们在实验环境中研究命令式或声明式过程建模方法是否优于过程模型理解。即使在考虑应该更好地相互匹配的任务类型时,我们的研究也发现,命令式流程建模语言似乎与更好的理解联系在一起。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号