首页> 外文会议>Transportation Research Board Annual meeting >Evaluation for Microsurfacing as Pavement Preservation Treatment: A Case Study
【24h】

Evaluation for Microsurfacing as Pavement Preservation Treatment: A Case Study

机译:微路面作为路面养护处理的评估:一个案例研究

获取原文

摘要

Over the years, the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT) has changed itsemphasis from construction to preservation of public highways. As such, there is greatinterest in assessing cost efficacy of a pavement preservation strategy. This paper aims topresent the functional and structural benefits of microsurfacing applications at highwaysections in Indiana. To achieve this goal, comprehensive monitoring and data analysiswas performed using the Pavement Condition Rating (PCR), Structure Number (SN), andsurface roughness (IRI) for in-situ performance evaluation. According to the deflectionand roughness analysis, an improvement was observed in SN and IRI during the early lifeof the pavement. Furthermore, no significant difference was obtained over the followingtwo years. Application of the microsurfacing resulted in a significant rise in PCR, SN anddecline in IRI. A similar result was found at the resurfacing site. Pavement withmicrosurface sections had stable roughness with only a two point increase every year.The two control sections (SR-68 and SR-145) have had four point increases on average.The IRI for SR-58 resurfacing was 48 in. /mile at 2009 (after construction), which isalmost half of the 2008 (before construction) IRI value. The rates of decline of the SN,IRI were no different statistically for untreated control sections, and the rate of decline ofthe PCR was slightly higher than in the pavement preservation project, includingresurfacing and microsurfacing. The cost study indicated that microsurfacing would bedeemed cost effective if it could provide more than 1.6 years service life, and resurfacingwould be cost effective if it could provide more than 3 years service life. Consideringcost as well as performance, pavement preservation should be an effective strategy toeliminate or retard damage. If applied properly, microsurfacing is an economicalalternative to conventional resurfacing. The case study results demonstrate thatmicrosurfacing is a cost-effectiveness treatment in addressing pavement distresses and inextending pavement life in general.
机译:多年来,印第安纳州交通运输部(INDOT)已更改了其 从建设到保护公共公路的重点。因此,有很棒的 对评估路面养护策略的成本效益的兴趣。本文旨在 展示了高速公路微表层应用的功能和结构优势 在印第安纳州。为了实现这一目标,需要进行全面的监控和数据分析 使用路面状况等级(PCR),结构编号(SN)和 表面粗糙度(IRI)用于原位性能评估。根据挠度 和粗糙度分析,发现早期SN和IRI有所改善 的人行道。此外,在以下方面未获得显着差异 两年微表面处理的应用导致PCR,SN和 IRI下降。在铺面现场发现了类似的结果。铺装 微表面截面具有稳定的粗糙度,每年仅增加两点。 两个控制部分(SR-68和SR-145)平均增加了四个点。 SR-58重铺表面的IRI在2009年(施工后)为48英寸/英里。 几乎是2008年(施工前)IRI值的一半。 SN的下降率, 未经处理的对照切片的IRI差异无统计学意义,且IRI的下降率 PCR略高于人行道养护项目,包括 重新铺面和微铺面。成本研究表明,微表面处理将是 如果可以提供1.6年以上的使用寿命,并且重新表面处理,则认为具有成本效益 如果可以提供3年以上的使用寿命,则将具有成本效益。考虑中 成本和性能,路面养护应该是一种有效的策略, 消除或阻止损害。如果正确应用,微表面处理是一种经济的方法 替代常规表面重铺。案例研究结果表明 微表面处理是解决路面问题和降低路面质量的一种经济有效的方法。 总体上延长路面寿命。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号