首页> 外文会议>AGBA world congress >Risk or Uncertainty?-An empirical validation of the conceptual distinction between concepts
【24h】

Risk or Uncertainty?-An empirical validation of the conceptual distinction between concepts

机译:风险或不确定性? - 概念区别概念的实证验证

获取原文

摘要

The impact of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty (PEU) on international entry mode choice has been subject to much empirical investigation. In preparation for studying this domain, conceptual and measurement models have been developed and refined for PEU. However, the concept of uncertainty contains an inherent ambiguity flowing through research from very early conceptualisations. The purpose of this paper is to explore and clarify whether a distinction between uncertainty and risk can be validated both conceptually and empirically. Our findings are based on a review of extant literature and quantitative analysis of 73 firms engaging in international operations, and demonstrate that despite the initial ambiguity regarding the concepts, a meaningful delineation between the definition of uncertainty and risk can be made, and that this conceptualisation of risk is statistically different from PEU. This provides a context from which further studies in the future can more accurately capture organisation's response to environmental uncertainty and risk.
机译:感知环境不确定性(PEU)对国际进入模式选择的影响一直受到大量实证调查。为准备研究该域,为PEU开发和精炼概念和测量模型。然而,不确定性的概念包含从非常早期概念化的研究流动的固有歧义。本文的目的是探索和阐明是否可以在概念上和经验上验证不确定性和风险之间的区别。我们的调查结果基于对现存的文学文学和定量分析,与国际业务的73家公司的定量分析,并证明,尽管有关于概念的初始歧义,但可以制定不确定和风险的定义之间的有意义的描绘,这是这种概念化风险与peu有统计学不同。这提供了未来进一步研究的背景,可以更准确地捕捉组织对环境不确定性和风险的反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号