首页> 外文会议>2011 8th International Workshop on the Design of Reliable Communication Networks >Spare capacity allocation using shared backup path protection for dual link failures
【24h】

Spare capacity allocation using shared backup path protection for dual link failures

机译:使用共享备份路径保护进行双链路故障的备用容量分配

获取原文

摘要

This paper extends the spare capacity allocation (SCA) problem from single link failure [1] to dual link failures on mesh-like IP or WDM networks. The SCA problem pre-plans traffic flows with mutually disjoint one working and two backup paths using the shared backup path protection (SBPP) scheme. The aggregated spare provision matrix (SPM) is used to capture the spare capacity sharing for dual link failures. Comparing to a previous work by He and Somani [2], this method has better scalability and flexibility. The SCA problem is formulated in a non-linear integer programming model and partitioned into two sequential linear sub-models: one finds all primary backup paths first, and the other finds all secondary backup paths next. The results on five networks show that the network redundancy using dedicated 1+1+1 is in the range of 313–400%. It drops to 96–181% in 1:1:1 without loss of dual-link resiliency, but with the trade-off of using the complicated share capacity sharing among backup paths. The hybrid 1+1:1 provides intermediate redundancy ratio at 187–310% with a moderate complexity. We also compare the passive/active approaches which consider spare capacity sharing after/during the backup path routing process. The active sharing approaches always achieve lower redundancy values than the passive ones. These reduction percentages are about 12% for 1+1:1 and 25% for 1:1:1 respectively.
机译:本文将备用容量分配(SCA)问题从单链路故障[1]扩展到网状IP或WDM网络上的双链路故障。 SCA问题使用共享备份路径保护(SBPP)方案以互不相交的一个工作路径和两个备份路径预先计划流量。聚集的备用供应矩阵(SPM)用于捕获双链路故障的备用容量共享。与He和Somani [2]的先前工作相比,该方法具有更好的可伸缩性和灵活性。 SCA问题是用非线性整数规划模型表示的,分为两个连续的线性子模型:一个首先找到所有主要的备用路径,另一个找到所有次要的备用路径。在五个网络上的结果表明,使用专用1 + 1 + 1的网络冗余范围为313–400%。在不损失双链路弹性的情况下,它以1:1:1的比例下降到96–181%,但是需要在备份路径之间使用复杂的共享容量共享进行权衡。混合1 + 1:1的中间冗余率为187-310%,复杂度适中。我们还比较了在备份路径路由过程之后/期间考虑备用容量共享的被动/主动方法。主动共享方法总是获得比被动共享方法更低的冗余值。对于1 + 1:1,这些减少百分比分别约为12%;对于1:1:1,这些减少百分比分别为25%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号