首页> 外文会议>International symposium on ballistics >THE TROUBLE WITH TNT EQUIVALENCE
【24h】

THE TROUBLE WITH TNT EQUIVALENCE

机译:与TNT等价的问题

获取原文

摘要

When assessing a high explosive, most blast calculations requirethe mass as an equivalent charge of TNT, since TNT is used bymany algorithms as the baseline. This equivalency is expected togive the same performance as the charge in question. Accurateequivalences are therefore key in determining performance.Unfortunately, there are no definitive methods or documents.Variability is found to be so significant that errors can be up to50%, with 20% to 30% being typical. Three standard explosives(RDX, HMX and Comp B) were assessed in detail and their TNTequivalence calculated. Standard scaling theory indicates thatTNT equivalence should be constant, this is shown as incorrect.UFC manuals recommend only the use of Heats of Detonation forequivalence, this and other functions such as Power Index andHydrodynamic Work are assessed. This paper looks at the issuesand recommends that Power Index is used to calculate the TNTequivalence for blast.
机译:在评估高爆炸物时,大多数爆炸计算都需要 质量,即TNT的等效电荷,因为TNT用于 许多算法作为基准。这种等效性有望 提供与上述收费相同的效果。准确的 因此,等效性是决定绩效的关键。 不幸的是,没有确定的方法或文件。 发现差异是如此之大,以至于错误可能高达 50%,典型的是20%到30%。三种标准炸药 (RDX,HMX和Comp B)进行了详细评估,并评估了其TNT 计算的当量。标准缩放理论表明 TNT等效项应为常数,这显示为不正确。 UFC手册仅建议将爆轰热用于 等价,此功能和其他功能,例如功率指数和 评估水动力工作。本文着眼于问题 并建议使用功率指数来计算TNT 等价于爆炸。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号