首页> 外文会议>SAE World congress >Comparison of Impact Due to an Aerodynamic Component in Wind Tunnel and On-Road Tests
【24h】

Comparison of Impact Due to an Aerodynamic Component in Wind Tunnel and On-Road Tests

机译:风洞和道路测试中空气动力成分的冲击比较

获取原文

摘要

The aerodynamic performance of new vehicles is commonly determined using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and wind tunnel tests. The final assessment is carried out by actual running tests. In particular, ideas regarding fuel consumption improvement that relate to components for the reduction of the coefficient of drag (C_D) value are evaluated by coast-down tests. However, a difference often exists between the component's efficiency between wind tunnel tests and coast-down tests. Therefore, we focused on the efficiency of an air-dam spoiler in reducing C_d values. A comparison was made between the aerodynamic effect of the air-dam spoiler in wind tunnel and coast-down tests in terms of the C_d value and the wake structure behind the vehicle. To determine the relationship between the C_d value and the wake structure behind the vehicle, we measured vehicle speed, wind velocity and direction, vehicle height, and pressure distribution on the back door. The results revealed that the C_D values were reduced approximately 7% by attaching the air-dam spoiler in both the wind tunnel and coast-down tests. In contrast, the values of pressure coefficient restoration on the back door differed between the wind tunnel and coast-down tests. In the coast-down tests, the values of pressure coefficient restoration were approximately 16% less than those in the wind tunnel tests. Similarly, the Strouhal numbers of the pressure coefficient of the coast-down tests were smaller than those of the wind tunnel tests. This was considered to be causally related to the rolling wheels and the moving ground under the vehicle in the actual running tests. Given this, we should study the flow field behind the vehicle to elucidate the relationship between the C_ D value and the wake structure. This correlation also needs to be examined in terms of the pressure measurement results.
机译:通常使用计算流体动力学(CFD)和风洞测试来确定新车辆的空气动力学性能。最终评估是通过实际运行测试进行的。尤其是,通过滑行试验评估了与用于降低风阻系数(C_D)值的组件有关的燃油消耗改进方面的想法。但是,风洞测试和滑行测试之间的组件效率通常存在差异。因此,我们专注于减小D_值的气坝扰流板的效率。根据C_d值和车辆后方的尾流结构,对风洞扰流板在风洞和滑行试验中的空气动力效果进行了比较。为了确定C_d值与车辆后方尾流结构之间的关系,我们测量了车辆速度,风速和方向,车辆高度以及后门上的压力分布。结果表明,通过在风洞试验和滑行试验中安装空气坝扰流板,C_D值降低了约7%。相反,在风洞试验和滑行试验之间,后门的压力系数恢复值有所不同。在滑行试验中,压力系数恢复值比风洞试验中的值低约16%。同样,滑行试验的压力系数的斯特劳哈尔数小于风洞试验的压力系数。在实际行驶测试中,这被认为与车辆下的滚轮和运动地面有因果关系。鉴于此,我们应该研究车辆后面的流场,以阐明C_ D值与尾流结构之间的关系。还需要根据压力测量结果检查这种相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号