【24h】

Preface

机译:前言

获取原文

摘要

This volume contains the papers presented at the twenty-seventh1 annual conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), held at Lake Tahoe, Nevada, December 5th through 8th, 2013. NIPS is a premier interdisciplinary conference that highlights information processing research from computational, biological, physical, and mathematical perspectives. This synthesis of backgrounds enables unique insights into learning processes, and we are pleased to present the exciting results in this volume. The papers were accepted to NIPS following a thorough, highly competitive and rigorous review process. We had 1420 submissions of which only 360 were accepted to the conference. NIPS is a very selective and high-quality conference thanks to the outstanding efforts of the group of people who evaluate, select and improve the papers: the program chairs, the program committee, and the reviewers. Every paper received at least three double-blind reviews, and a meta-review by a program committee member. In cases where reviews were contradictory or the reviewers were uncertain, additional reviewers were assigned. After the initial reviews were entered into the system, the authors were given the opportunity to respond to the reviews, and an electronic discussion was initiated in which the reviewers and the program committee member responsible for that paper tried to resolve any differences of opinion regarding the paper. In case major disagreement still existed after the discussion, additional reviewers could be assigned to the paper. Final decisions were made on September 5th, 2013 after series of group teleconferences between program committee members.
机译:该卷包含在2013年12月5日至10日至2013年12月8日举行的The The The Seventh The Neweral信息处理系统(NIPS)年度关于Tahoe Lake Tahoe湖的年度会议上的论文.NIPS是一项高级跨学科会议,突出了从计算中的信息处理研究,生物学,物理和数学观点。这种背景的合成使得独特的见解进入学习过程,我们很高兴在此卷中展示令人兴奋的结果。在彻底,高竞争力和严格的审查过程之后,纸纸被接受尼斯。我们有1420份提交的大会,该会议只接受了360名。尼斯是一项非常有选择和高质量的会议,由于评估,选择和改进论文的突出,选择和改进论文:方案椅,计划委员会和审稿人。每张纸张收到至少三次双盲评论,并由计划委员会成员审查。在涉及矛盾或审核人员不确定的情况下,分配了其他审核人员。在初步审查进入该系统后,作者曾有机会回复审查,并启动了电子讨论,其中审查员和负责该文件的方案委员会成员试图解决有关任何意见的任何意见差异纸。如果在讨论后仍然存在重大分歧,则可以将其他审阅者分配给论文。最终决定于2013年9月5日在计划委员会成员之间的一系列集团电话会议之后进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号