首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Low-Power Electronics and Design >Accurate modeling and calculation of delay and energy overheads of dynamic voltage scaling in modern high-performance microprocessors
【24h】

Accurate modeling and calculation of delay and energy overheads of dynamic voltage scaling in modern high-performance microprocessors

机译:现代高性能微处理器中动态电压缩放的延迟和能量开销的精确建模和计算

获取原文

摘要

Dynamic voltage and frequency scaling (DVS) has been studied for well over a decade, and even commercial systems widely support DVS nowadays. Nevertheless, existing DVS transition overhead models do not accurately reflect modern DVS architectures including modern DC-DC converters, PLL (Phase Lock Loop), and voltage and frequency change policies. Incorrect DVS overhead models prevent one from achieving the maximum energy gain, by misleading the DVS control policies. This paper introduces an accurate DVS overhead model, in terms of both energy consumption and time penalty, through detailed observation of modern DVS setups and voltage and frequency change guidelines from vendors. We introduce new major contributors to the DVS overhead including the performance underdrive loss of the DVS-enabled microprocessor, additional inductor IR loss, and so on, as well as consideration of power efficiency from discontinuous-mode DC-DC conversion. Our DVS overhead model enhances the DVS overhead model accuracy from 86% to 238% for Intel Core2 Duo E6850 and LTC3733.
机译:对动态电压和频率缩放(DVS)的研究已经进行了十多年,如今,甚至商用系统也广泛支持DVS。但是,现有的DVS过渡开销模型无法准确反映现代DVS架构,包括现代DC-DC转换器,PLL(锁相环)以及电压和频率变化策略。错误的DVS开销模型会误导DVS控制策略,从而无法实现最大的能量增益。本文通过详细观察现代DVS设置以及供应商提供的电压和频率变化指南,从能耗和时间损失两方面介绍了一种精确的DVS开销模型。我们为DVS开销引入了新的主要因素,包括启用DVS的微处理器的性能欠驱动损耗,额外的电感器IR损耗等,以及考虑不连续模式DC-DC转换的功率效率。我们的DVS开销模型将Intel Core2 Duo E6850和LTC3733的DVS开销模型的准确性从86%提高到238%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号